1997
DOI: 10.1115/1.2796065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Modeling of Steady Inspiratory Airflow Through a Three-Generation Model of the Human Central Airways

Abstract: Two-dimensional steady inspiratory airflow through a three-generation model of the human central airways is numerically investigated, with dimensions corresponding to those encountered in the fifth to seventh generations of the Weibel's model. Wall curvatures are added at the outer walls of the junctions for physiological purposes. Computations are carried out for Reynolds numbers in the mother branch ranging from 200 to 1200, which correspond to mouth air breathing at flow rates ranging from 0.27 to 1.63 lite… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several theoretical conjectures remain largely untested, while direct computation has only given solutions either accurately over a few generations or with limited detail over more generations (see Hademenos et al 1996;Pries et al 1998;Goldman & Popel 2000;Smith & Jones 2003). Related branching or network studies have been conducted with some success by Handa et al (1993), Miyasaka et al (1993), Pedley et al (1994), Gatlin et al (1995), Young et al (1996), Gao et al (1997), Hademenos & Massoud (1997), Wilquem & Degrez (1997), Zhai et al (1997), Pries et al (1998), Brada & Kitchen (2000), Kassab et al (2000), Lorthois et al (2000), McEvoy et al (2000), Cassidy et al (2001) and Comer et al (2001). The presence of an arteriovenous malformation in a cranial system eventually requires study of the application of type I within the wider framework of an application similar to type II.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several theoretical conjectures remain largely untested, while direct computation has only given solutions either accurately over a few generations or with limited detail over more generations (see Hademenos et al 1996;Pries et al 1998;Goldman & Popel 2000;Smith & Jones 2003). Related branching or network studies have been conducted with some success by Handa et al (1993), Miyasaka et al (1993), Pedley et al (1994), Gatlin et al (1995), Young et al (1996), Gao et al (1997), Hademenos & Massoud (1997), Wilquem & Degrez (1997), Zhai et al (1997), Pries et al (1998), Brada & Kitchen (2000), Kassab et al (2000), Lorthois et al (2000), McEvoy et al (2000), Cassidy et al (2001) and Comer et al (2001). The presence of an arteriovenous malformation in a cranial system eventually requires study of the application of type I within the wider framework of an application similar to type II.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unambiguous experimental and numerical evidences of inertial effects have been observed in several studies on flow though branched structures, with special emphasis on the bronchial tree [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Such phenomena exists in real lungs but they are more simple to study in a symmetric geometry [15,16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the inhaled air, we consider that the air speed is not so high as to permit avoiding the need to choose an appropriate, if any, turbulence model for the airflow. Like many previous investigations, such as some of them in [1][2][3][4][5][6][7], the flow is investigated in a domain of two dimensions to facilitate the analysis. As with the conventional gas-solid two-phase flow analyses, we assume that the gas and solid phases have complementary regions.…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem, known as the Weibel model of the human central airway, has been considered by Wilquem and Degrez [1]. The domain, schematically shown in Fig.…”
Section: Weibel Model Of the Human Central Airwaymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation