2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00231-019-02805-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical investigation on effects of fuel tube diameter and co-flow velocity in a methane/air non-premixed flame

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Turbulence level also explains part of the differences observed between the simulations. Indeed, the lower efficiency of the micro-scale mixing between the gas and oxygen can explain the enlargement of the temperature profile at the expense of its sharpness in Case 2 [72,73]. Similar results were reported for other feedstocks combustion in different reactors [74][75][76].…”
Section: Axial Temperature Profilesupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Turbulence level also explains part of the differences observed between the simulations. Indeed, the lower efficiency of the micro-scale mixing between the gas and oxygen can explain the enlargement of the temperature profile at the expense of its sharpness in Case 2 [72,73]. Similar results were reported for other feedstocks combustion in different reactors [74][75][76].…”
Section: Axial Temperature Profilesupporting
confidence: 82%
“…For NO x reduction and to avoid safety risks related to the high hydrogen-air flame speed (up to 50 m/s) and low quenching diameters (up to 0.5 mm), required to ensure prevention of the flashback in case of the fully premixed burner concepts, several micro-mixers or micro-nozzle burner solutions were recently patented and results of their operation reported in the literature [1][2][3]. To optimize the flame stability and combustion properties of H 2 , a common approach is the modification of the burner or nozzle geometry [4][5][6]. In this regard, previous studies deal with the comparison of different combustion models using detailed chemistry and concluded that the reduced reaction mechanism method showed the best agreement with experiments in terms of capturing and mapping the typical flame structure [3,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%