1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1204(199907/08)12:4<275::aid-jnm330>3.0.co;2-e
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Numerical aspects in time domain modelling of arbitrarily curved thin wire antennas

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
8
1
0
0

Citation Types

0
5
0
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 9 publications

(5 citation statements)
references

References 13 publications

0
5
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The geometrical details of the linear antenna are: wire thickness 2w = 2.5 mm, length λ/4 = 2.1875 mm and feeding gap d = 1.25 mm. The geometrical details of the examined helical antenna are: helix radius α = 2.5 mm, pitch B = 1.25 mm, wire thickness w = 0.1 mm, turns L = 4, and feeding gap d = 0.2 mm (Cerri et al, 1999). Either of the above described phone radiating elements is mounted on the top corner of a metal handset box as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Head and Antenna Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.
“…The geometrical details of the linear antenna are: wire thickness 2w = 2.5 mm, length λ/4 = 2.1875 mm and feeding gap d = 1.25 mm. The geometrical details of the examined helical antenna are: helix radius α = 2.5 mm, pitch B = 1.25 mm, wire thickness w = 0.1 mm, turns L = 4, and feeding gap d = 0.2 mm (Cerri et al, 1999). Either of the above described phone radiating elements is mounted on the top corner of a metal handset box as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Head and Antenna Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.
“…Equation (3) can be solved for the actual current values Ik,n in every time step using the marching on in time version of the MOM. In this way the equation (3) involving integral and differential operations is transformed into a linear, iterative relation that provides an explicit evaluation of the current [6]. At the actual time step the unknown current Ik,n is calculated by using the (4) where Gkm,i contains the coupling coefficient vectors of the current values [5] at earlier time steps i. Kk, is the self term integral (m = k).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We give numbers m to all boundary surface elements on the TLM-subregion. The radiated electromagnetic field on the center of these patches coming from the current distribution along the wire segments is obtained by [ (6) where Sk is the location of the wire segments. R is the distance between the destination rm on the boundary surface element m of the TLM-subregion and source position vectors r' on the wire segments, T = t -R/c is a properly delayed time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…R is the distance between the destination rm on the boundary surface element m of the TLM-subregion and source position vectors r' on the wire segments, T = t -R/c is a properly delayed time. By approximating the current to be constant at given time in a given subdomain we obtain the radiated e. m. field at the patch m by (6). destination and at the source points, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies that the unknown total field EBtot and HBt0t on the interface can be directly calculated from the known incident field and an integral that is also known from the past history of the same field. This process is called marching-on-in-time (MOT) method [6]. In every time step on the interface patch m, the e. m. field values coming from outside the TLM-subregion are obtained by superposition of the radiated field from the wire structure and the radiated field from the neighbored patches s. This field values E"ut and H r,out are mapped on the TLM wave amplitudes am,j, on those transmission lines which are cut by the TLM-subregion boundary, and injected back to the TLM simulation [8] am,j 1 (-nTm x nTm xEjut +ZnTm x HrOUt) (9)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.