2021
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0001727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Analysis on Shear Behavior of Grouped Head Stud Shear Connectors between Steel Girders and Precast Concrete Slabs with High-Strength Concrete-Filled Shear Pockets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, as shear deformation of the stud continues to develop, the separation increases dramatically. 42 For specimens subjected to a bidirectional shear force (0.3HV1, 0.6HV1, and 0.3HV3), the normal separations exhibited a greater growth rate. When the peak load was reached, the normal separations of specimens V1, 0.3HV1, 0.6HV1, V3, and 0.3HV3 were 0.135 mm, 0.224 mm, 0.261 mm, 0.126 mm, and 0.222 mm, respectively.…”
Section: Transverse Slip and Separation Developmentmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Subsequently, as shear deformation of the stud continues to develop, the separation increases dramatically. 42 For specimens subjected to a bidirectional shear force (0.3HV1, 0.6HV1, and 0.3HV3), the normal separations exhibited a greater growth rate. When the peak load was reached, the normal separations of specimens V1, 0.3HV1, 0.6HV1, V3, and 0.3HV3 were 0.135 mm, 0.224 mm, 0.261 mm, 0.126 mm, and 0.222 mm, respectively.…”
Section: Transverse Slip and Separation Developmentmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The surface-to-surface contact algorithm was adopted in this numerical study because this contact can obtain accurate results compared to the test results. 42 The contact surfaces associated with the head studs and steel plate were set as the master surface, and the concrete surfaces were chosen to be the slave surface. Moreover, a friction coefficient of 0.25 was used for the contact between the head studs and concrete.…”
Section: Contact Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The original empirical formulae hardly reflect the interaction mechanism between stud and concrete, so they cannot accurately predict the large-diameter connectors’ stiffness, shear strength, and load–slip curves. Chuah et al [ 12 ], An & Cederwall [ 13 ], Nie et al [ 14 ], Hegger et al [ 15 , 16 ], Döinghaus et al [ 17 ], and Wang et al [ 18 ] investigated the effects of high-strength concrete and high-strength steel commonly used in engineering on the shear behavior of headed stud shear connectors. The studies showed that there exists a critical value in the effect of the compressive strength of concrete on the shear behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%