2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical analysis on load-bearing capacity and damage of double scarf adhesive joints subjected to combined loadings of tension and bending

Abstract: a b s t r a c tThe load-bearing capacity and the damage level of the double scarf joint (DSJ) under combined loadings of tension and bending were investigated numerically, which takes into account the effects of scarf angle and adhesive type. A finite element method (FEM), which includes a mixed-mode cohesive zone model (CZM) with a bilinear shape, was employed to govern the interface separation behaviors. At the point corresponding to the ultimate loading, it was observed that the interface damage level of DS… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Modifying the joint configuration drives to a change in the joint interface stress distribution and then the joint strength. In order to enhance bond properties joint geometry is tailored and various kinds of joint configuration are proposed for adhesive joints namely stepped [7], scarf [8,9], double scarf [10] and reverse bent [11]. For thick laminate, all of these bonded joint methodologies (except reverse bent) are suitable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modifying the joint configuration drives to a change in the joint interface stress distribution and then the joint strength. In order to enhance bond properties joint geometry is tailored and various kinds of joint configuration are proposed for adhesive joints namely stepped [7], scarf [8,9], double scarf [10] and reverse bent [11]. For thick laminate, all of these bonded joint methodologies (except reverse bent) are suitable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reduction of peel stress is due to the elimination of the eccentricities of applied loads, while shear stress is reduced by removing the differential straining effect [6]. The scarf joint is considered as the best in terms of strength for the same bonding region, by further reducing the stress concentration because of the elimination of the geometry discontinuity, which appears in the lap joints [7]. Although, adhesively bonded joints have been used more often than that of mechanical joints in connecting the structural components owing to their advantages such as more uniform interfacial stress distributions, capability of joining different materials and high resistance to fatigue failure [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, studies on the strength of the adhesive were also carried out under different types of external loads for various types of adhesive joints. For this purpose, various adhesive joint models were subjected to loads such as three-point and four-point bending, and anti-symmetric, and investigations were conducted on what kind of tensile behavior the joint would exhibit in the interface [26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%