2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2015.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear Reprogramming by Defined Factors: Quantity Versus Quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cell plasticity confers flexibility to change the fate of terminally differentiated cells into a pluripotent state or other cell types 1, 2 . Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are pivotal resources to provide desired cell types, but the generation of iPSCs possibly entails unexpected incorporation and mutation in genomic DNA due to transfection of exogenous DNA delivered by viruses or plasmids, which might cause undesired effects after transplantation 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cell plasticity confers flexibility to change the fate of terminally differentiated cells into a pluripotent state or other cell types 1, 2 . Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are pivotal resources to provide desired cell types, but the generation of iPSCs possibly entails unexpected incorporation and mutation in genomic DNA due to transfection of exogenous DNA delivered by viruses or plasmids, which might cause undesired effects after transplantation 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When compared with hESC-based cell therapy, iPSCs were thought to provide certain advantages, including the lack of ethic concerns and immune rejection by the recipient (13). However, recent studies have demonstrated the increased genomic instability, epigenetic abnormality, and immunogenicity of iPSCs, raising safety concerns of iPSC-based cell therapy (14, 15). Therefore, to improve the feasibility of iPSC-based therapy, it is important to understand the underlying reprogramming mechanism and develop strategies to minimize these safety concerns.…”
Section: The Promise Of Pluripotent Stem Cell (Psc)-derived Cells In mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be explained by the shared cell progeny and the degree of similarity between epigenetic marks and profile. Basically, this mutual epigenetic profile indicates that less epigenetic barriers have to be crossed (Sebban and Buganim 2016; Bernstein et al 2007). Indeed, in Waddington’s epigenetic landscape, cell lineages within a germ layer are separated by lower ‘hills’ compared to the hills between different germ layer-originating cell types (Ladewig et al 2013).…”
Section: Direct Reprogramming Into Chondrocytesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, transgene integration is avoided in order to prevent teratoma formation, increasing the suitability for clinical application (Sebban and Buganim 2016). Nevertheless, it is acknowledged that continuous expression of the reprogramming factors c-Myc, Klf4 and especially Sox9 is required.…”
Section: Direct Reprogramming Into Chondrocytesmentioning
confidence: 99%