2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NREM sleep stages specifically alter dynamical integration of large-scale brain networks

Abstract: Functional dissociations in the brain observed during non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep have been associated with reduced information integration and impaired consciousness that accompany increasing sleep depth. Here, we explored the dynamical properties of large-scale functional brain networks derived from transient brain activity using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Spatial brain maps generally display significant modifications in terms of their tendency to occur across wakefulness and NREM sleep. … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
5
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In summary, these results suggest that following prolonged wakefulness, the proportional integration and segregation of brain activity within structured cortical networks appears to be driven from levels in well RW towards those observed during offline states, such as NREM sleep, suggesting that there exists an underlying continuum of functional segregation from RW to NREM sleep. We were not able to robustly measure the differences between NREM2 and NREM3 in this study with the same amount of consecutive data points as in the wake conditions; however, other studies suggest that brain networks are even more segregated during NREM3 compared to NREM2 sleep [ 35 ] and that total integration decreases in proportion to SWA [ 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In summary, these results suggest that following prolonged wakefulness, the proportional integration and segregation of brain activity within structured cortical networks appears to be driven from levels in well RW towards those observed during offline states, such as NREM sleep, suggesting that there exists an underlying continuum of functional segregation from RW to NREM sleep. We were not able to robustly measure the differences between NREM2 and NREM3 in this study with the same amount of consecutive data points as in the wake conditions; however, other studies suggest that brain networks are even more segregated during NREM3 compared to NREM2 sleep [ 35 ] and that total integration decreases in proportion to SWA [ 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Beyond simple averaging, clustering algorithms (e.g., K-means and consensus clustering) can be employed to discern multiple CAPs or iCAPs at the whole-brain level for a large number of subjects. Previous findings based on iCAPs have for instance revealed organizational principles of brain function during rest (Karahanoglu and Ville 2015) and sleep (Tarun et al 2021) in healthy controls, next to alterations in 22q11ds (Zoeller et al 2019) and multiple sclerosis (Bommarito et al in press). Next to CAPs-inspired approaches, dynamic functional connectivity has recently been investigated with the use of co-fluctuations and edge-centric techniques (Faskowitz et al 2020;Esfahlani et al 2020;Jo et al 2021;Sporns et al 2021;van Oort et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We also revealed a unique LH-ACC interaction underlying the varied brain state-dependent pupil dynamics. The ACC is an important hub of the default mode network in both humans and rats 37 , and its involvement in the resting-state connectivity has been observed to differ between high and low arousal states, showing a decreased participation of the ACC in the default mode network during the lower arousal state compared to higher state 38,39 . The neural activity in the ACC has been linked to arousal fluctuation and associated with pupil size changes, which can be explained by its bidirectional connection to the noradrenergic LC 4,13,16,40 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%