2012
DOI: 10.13031/2013.41340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NOX Emissions and Performance of a Single-Cylinder Diesel Engine with Emulsified and Non-Emulsified Fuels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The lowest BSFC (284.2 g/kW·h) was produced when CS-B100 was used, which was lower than 364.58 g/kW·h and 333.27 g/kW·h for CSB-E20 and CSB-ME20, respectively. These results matched the results of [18,26], who recorded a decline in the brake power with emulsion fuels, and were not consistent with [19] and [22], who found higher brake power with emulsion fuels. Figure 10.…”
Section: Engine Brake Specific Fuel Consumptioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The lowest BSFC (284.2 g/kW·h) was produced when CS-B100 was used, which was lower than 364.58 g/kW·h and 333.27 g/kW·h for CSB-E20 and CSB-ME20, respectively. These results matched the results of [18,26], who recorded a decline in the brake power with emulsion fuels, and were not consistent with [19] and [22], who found higher brake power with emulsion fuels. Figure 10.…”
Section: Engine Brake Specific Fuel Consumptioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…This maximum power of CSB-ME20 at 2320 rpm was lower than the maximum power from CSB-B100, which was found to be at 2900 rpm. The general outcomes presented in Figure 9 were inconsistent with the results of [22] and [19]. Davis Johnson [22] found that emulsion fuel produced more power than net biodiesel fuel at all engine speeds in spite of the 11.1% lower heating value of the emulsion fuel.…”
Section: Brake Powermentioning
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations