2009
DOI: 10.1029/2009gl040457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Northward thinning of Tibetan crust revealed by virtual seismic profiles

Abstract: [1] A new approach of constructing deep-penetrating seismic profiles reveals significant, regional variations in crustal thickness under near-constant elevation of Tibet. Over distances of hundreds of kilometers, the crust is as thick as 75 km in southern Tibet but shoals to just over 60 km under the Qiangtang terrane in central Tibet where the deviation from Airy isostasy is equivalent to a thickness of over 10 km in missing crust. Northward thinning of crust occurs gradually over a distance of about 200 km w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
73
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
5
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Crustal thicknesses beneath stable cratons vary by more than 10-15 km, for instance beneath India [Gupta et al, 2003;Kiselev et al, 2008;Rai et al, 2005], Canada [e.g., Perry et al, 2002], and the Great Plains of the USA [Gilbert, 2012;Sheehan et al, 1995], as well as beneath Tibet [e.g., Tseng et al, 2009]. Again from (2), if uncompensated, such differences in crustal thickness would generate free-air and isostatic gravity anomalies approaching 200-300 mGal.…”
Section: "Residual" Topography and "Dynamic" Topographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crustal thicknesses beneath stable cratons vary by more than 10-15 km, for instance beneath India [Gupta et al, 2003;Kiselev et al, 2008;Rai et al, 2005], Canada [e.g., Perry et al, 2002], and the Great Plains of the USA [Gilbert, 2012;Sheehan et al, 1995], as well as beneath Tibet [e.g., Tseng et al, 2009]. Again from (2), if uncompensated, such differences in crustal thickness would generate free-air and isostatic gravity anomalies approaching 200-300 mGal.…”
Section: "Residual" Topography and "Dynamic" Topographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is approximately the southern portion of a region in northern Tibet where a number of previous studies have argued for an unusually warm upper mantle, including an unusually thin crust over a regional scale (implying thermal isostasy), and perhaps lateral (E-W trending) flows in the upper mantle, as indicated by very large values (∼2 s) of shear wave birefringence, or even partial melts [Chen et al, 2010;Chen and Özalaybey, 1998;Jiménez-Munt et al, 2008;McNamara et al, 1997;Molnar and Chen, 1984;Ni and Barazangi, 1983;Owens and Zandt, 1997;Tseng et al, 2009].…”
Section: Large-scale Anomalies In the Upper Mantlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This view contrasts with the alternative that the gravitational potential energy of northern Tibet should, in fact, be greater than that of southern Tibet. Crust beneath northern Tibet is thinner by 10-15 km than that beneath southern Tibet [e.g., Owens and Zandt, 1997;Tseng et al, 2009], but elevations are virtually the same. Consequently, the gravitational potential energy per unit area is larger by a few TN/m (10 12 N/m), a difference comparable to that between lithosphere at mid-ocean ridges and at old oceanic lithosphere [e.g., Molnar and Stock, 2009].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%