2012
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normalized Confinement Stiffness Approach for Modeling FRP-Confined Concrete

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparison of the model performances shown in Figs. [9][10][11] indicates that the proposed model performs significantly better than the existing models in predicting the ultimate conditions of FRP-confined HSC.…”
Section: A New Model For Frp-confined Square and Rectangular Columnsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparison of the model performances shown in Figs. [9][10][11] indicates that the proposed model performs significantly better than the existing models in predicting the ultimate conditions of FRP-confined HSC.…”
Section: A New Model For Frp-confined Square and Rectangular Columnsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A recent comprehensive review study [1] revealed that over 200 experimental studies have been conducted over the last two decades on the compressive behavior of FRP-confined concrete, resulting in the development of over 80 axial stress-strain models (e.g. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]). However, the majority of these studies focused on FRPwrapped specimens and studies examining the behavior of CFFTs remain limited [11][12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent comprehensive review study (Ozbakkaloglu et al [1]) revealed that over 200 experimental studies have been conducted over the last two decades on the compressive behavior of FRP-confined concrete resulting in the developments of over 80 axial stress-strain models (e.g. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]). However, the majority of these studies focused on FRP-confined specimens manufactured with FRP-wrapped jackets, and studies examining the behavior of FRP tube-encased concrete remain limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8). The models of ACI 440.2R-08 (ACI 2008), Teng et al (2009), andTepfers (2003) show that the precision of these models are not good, whereas the model of Yazici and Hadi (2012) exhibits good predictions in this case. For further verification, Fig.…”
Section: Circular Frp-confined Concrete Columnsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…5) to assess the performance of existing models and the proposed model. Seven existing models were considered in this verification [Karbhari and Gao 1997;Toutanji 1999;De Lorenzis and Tepfers 2003;ACI 440.2R-08 (ACI 2008);Teng et al 2009;Yazici and Hadi 2012]. Because of the limited space in the writers' paper, only four models that have comparable performance are shown (Fig.…”
Section: Circular Frp-confined Concrete Columnsmentioning
confidence: 99%