2012
DOI: 10.1021/jp3094935
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normal Mode Analysis of the Spectral Density of the Fenna–Matthews–Olson Light-Harvesting Protein: How the Protein Dissipates the Excess Energy of Excitons

Abstract: We report a method for the structure-based calculation of the spectral density of the pigment–protein coupling in light-harvesting complexes that combines normal-mode analysis with the charge density coupling (CDC) and transition charge from electrostatic potential (TrEsp) methods for the computation of site energies and excitonic couplings, respectively. The method is applied to the Fenna–Matthews–Olson (FMO) protein in order to investigate the influence of the different parts of the spectral density as well … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
193
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(200 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
(325 reference statements)
4
193
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These include weak electron-vibration coupling, spatially correlated [49,[53][54][55][56] environmental fluctuations at different chromophores and a slowly relaxing vibrational environment [57]. However, calculations so far indicate that environments at different chromophores are more or less independent [28,58]. The importance of the environment around the chromophores in light-harvesting complexes is indicated by the Stokes shift-the energy difference between the absorption and fluorescence maxima.…”
Section: Energy Transfer and The Question Of Coherencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include weak electron-vibration coupling, spatially correlated [49,[53][54][55][56] environmental fluctuations at different chromophores and a slowly relaxing vibrational environment [57]. However, calculations so far indicate that environments at different chromophores are more or less independent [28,58]. The importance of the environment around the chromophores in light-harvesting complexes is indicated by the Stokes shift-the energy difference between the absorption and fluorescence maxima.…”
Section: Energy Transfer and The Question Of Coherencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,59 Comparison between the vibronic coupling matrix elements in Eqs. (38) and (43) shows this rate is a factor of 2 larger for each anticorrelated vibration delocalized over both donor and acceptor pigments than for the corresponding localized pigment vibration. It is instructive to consider the case in which a localized vibration on the donor and a localized vibration on the acceptor are both in near-resonance with the excitonic energy gap but not vibrationally resonant with each other (for example, ω A + δ = ω B − δ ∼ ∆ EX ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…51 In a rigid protein scaffold, fluctuations in the pigment orientations around the equilibrium position are only a small fraction of the center-to-center inter-pigment separations (∼12-15 Å in a FMO monomer 53 or ∼21 Å between bacteriochlorophyll a pigments of adjacent B800 and B850 rings in LH2 54 ) such that the fluctuations in the Coulombic coupling are small compared to the magnitude of the coupling. 38 In this paper, J is approximated as independent of both vibrational coordinates of the protein and intramolecular vibrational coordinates. The above Hamiltonian is standard in describing electronic energy transfer 3 within a network of chromophores which are linearly coupled to vibrational degrees of freedom in their excited states.…”
Section: A Dimer With Intramolecular Environmental and Mixed Vibramentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations