2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonsurgical management of condylar fractures in children: A 15-year clinical retrospective study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Open reduction is contraindicated the condylar head is fractured, in medical condition or systemic injury add undo risk to general anesthesia (15) . The management of these fractures in children is usually closed reduction (17) despite encountered postsurgical radiographic abnormalities, Condylar neck and subcondylar fractures are the most common mandibular fractures in adults. Subcondylar fractures are below the condylar neck.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Open reduction is contraindicated the condylar head is fractured, in medical condition or systemic injury add undo risk to general anesthesia (15) . The management of these fractures in children is usually closed reduction (17) despite encountered postsurgical radiographic abnormalities, Condylar neck and subcondylar fractures are the most common mandibular fractures in adults. Subcondylar fractures are below the condylar neck.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can speculate that inter-population difference in the sites of maxillofacial fractures partly related to the diverse etiologic factors involved. Zhou HH et al [26] observed similar results Several studies have suggested that mandibular fractures can be treated by closed reduction and I.M.F [19,20]. Olson et al [21] and Hill et al [22] concluded that most mandibular fractures were amenable to management by Closed Reduction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The study included 22 2, http://links.lww.com/SCS/E87]. The mean follow-up period was 80 weeks (1-3 years) at the last follow-up visit after surgery, the facial deformities were corrected in all cases postoperatively: the average relative distance of PO-ZM and ANS-ZM was 1.3 ± 0.6 mm (P = 0.22) and 1.2 ± 0.5 mm (P = 0.19), and there was no significant difference between the bilateral [Supplementary Digital Content, Table 3, http://links.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%