2015
DOI: 10.1007/s12555-013-0181-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonsingular finite-time second order sliding mode attitude control for reentry vehicle

Abstract: This paper presents nonlinear robust flight control strategies for the reentry vehicle which is nonlinear, coupling, and includes parameter uncertainties and external disturbances. Firstly, a finitetime second order sliding mode attitude control strategy is pointed out with the introduction of a nonsingular finite-time sliding mode manifold. By the proposed controller, the attitude tracking errors are mathematically proved to converge to zero within finite time and the chattering of sliding mode controller is … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…which is a sufficient condition for all trajectories starting outside this neighborhood and in the almost global domain of convergence of .I; 0/ to converge to this neighborhood. Expression (31) leads to expression (28) for the bound on the norm of the disturbance torque d for which convergence of state trajectories to the neighborhood N of .I; 0/ is guaranteed.…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…which is a sufficient condition for all trajectories starting outside this neighborhood and in the almost global domain of convergence of .I; 0/ to converge to this neighborhood. Expression (31) leads to expression (28) for the bound on the norm of the disturbance torque d for which convergence of state trajectories to the neighborhood N of .I; 0/ is guaranteed.…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This confirms earlier findings on greater robustness of finite-time stability to persistent disturbances, when compared with asymptotic stability. Note that the bound given by inequality (28) in Corollary 2 depends on the control gain values k 1 , k p , k v , and a i , i D 1; 2; 3. For a given value of these control gains, this bound may be conservative, because it is obtained as a sufficient condition for state trajectories to converge to this neighborhood.…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There exist several control methodologies for reentry vehicle in the literature. For example, the dynamics inversion (DI) control (Georgie and Valasek, 2003); linear parameter-varying (LPV) approach (Cai et al, 2014; Costa et al, 2003); trajectory linearization control (TLC) (Shao and Wang et al, 2015, 2016); sliding mode control (SMC)-based methods (Hall and Shtessel, 2012; Sheng, et al, 2015; Sheng et al, 2015); and finite time sliding mode control (FTSMC) technique (Guo et al, 2018b; Tian et al, 2015a, 2015b, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with conventional linear SMCs, TSMC offers the system a finite‐time convergence property and high tracking precision. In [14], a non‐singular sliding surface was constructed and a second‐order TSMC strategy was designed for finite‐time tracking and chattering reduction. An improved non‐singular TSMC method was proposed and a faster convergence speed was achieved compared with traditional non‐singular TSMC by introducing two exponential terms on the sliding surface [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%