2020
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonparametric galaxy morphology from UV to submm wavelengths

Abstract: We present the first nonparametric morphological analysis of a set of spiral galaxies from UV to submillimeter (submm) wavelengths. Our study is based on high-quality multi-wavelength imaging for nine well-resolved spiral galaxies from the DustPedia database, combined with nonparametric morphology indicators calculated in a consistent way using the StatMorph package. We measure the half-light radius, the concentration index, the asymmetry index, the smoothness index, the Gini coefficient, and the M 20 indicato… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 124 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a particular issue for those measuring asymmetries in HI gas (e.g Holwerda et al 2011;Giese et al 2016;Reynolds et al 2020). A recent work by Baes et al (2020) explored the change in asymmetry in a range of wavelengths from the UV to the submm, as well as subsequent derived data products such as stellar mass, dust mass, and starformation rate. Though they saw trends reflective of understood physical models, without assessing the varying signal-to-noise levels of those observations it is not clear how much of those trends are driven by noise effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a particular issue for those measuring asymmetries in HI gas (e.g Holwerda et al 2011;Giese et al 2016;Reynolds et al 2020). A recent work by Baes et al (2020) explored the change in asymmetry in a range of wavelengths from the UV to the submm, as well as subsequent derived data products such as stellar mass, dust mass, and starformation rate. Though they saw trends reflective of understood physical models, without assessing the varying signal-to-noise levels of those observations it is not clear how much of those trends are driven by noise effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessing the level of agreement between the morphologies of the full populations of observed and simulated galaxies is a hard task, due to the intrinsic complexity of galaxy shapes. The approach followed by some authors (Snyder et al 2015, Bottrell et al 2017b, Bottrell et al 2017a, Rodriguez-Gomez et al 2019, Bignone et al 2019, Baes et al 2020) consisted in making use of integrated, parametric and nonparametric quantities as diagnostics (such as the popular − − − − 20 statistics (e.g., Abraham et al 1994, Conselice 2003, Lotz et al 2004, with the aim of describing galaxy morphologies with only a few numbers. However, such an approach may still not grasp the full complexity of a galaxy image.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work we use the exact same procedure as Kapoor et al (2021) to obtain multi-wavelength sets of the elliptical half-light radii and of the CAS indices for a subset of ARTEMIS disc galaxies. This allows us to compare these morphological properties with those already calculated by Kapoor et al (2021) for similarly selected Auriga galaxies and by Baes et al (2020) for a set of well-resolved DustPedia spiral galaxies.…”
Section: Statmorphmentioning
confidence: 92%