Nonlinear Dynamics of Production Systems 2004
DOI: 10.1002/3527602585.ch5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear Models for Control of Manufacturing Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is exactly the limit in which we do not expect the PDE to behave very well. It would be interesting to study how the queueing model approaches a PDE model in the limit of many machines and many steps, but this is clearly beyond the current state of our understanding (but see Lefeber 2004). In the meantime, what can be done is to compare the PDE model with discreteevent simulations.…”
Section: A Relatively Small Re-entrant Factorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That is exactly the limit in which we do not expect the PDE to behave very well. It would be interesting to study how the queueing model approaches a PDE model in the limit of many machines and many steps, but this is clearly beyond the current state of our understanding (but see Lefeber 2004). In the meantime, what can be done is to compare the PDE model with discreteevent simulations.…”
Section: A Relatively Small Re-entrant Factorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard optimal control approaches in the production and inventory modeling context (e.g., Gershwin et al 1985) cannot solve our problem here: They are based on ODEs that cannot take into account the slowdown of the factory, as the load in the factory increases due to the control actions. Lefeber (2004) suggested an approach based on control theory of delay systems. Whether such an approach will work for the re-entrant factory with its large delays remains to be proven.…”
Section: Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models like (1) have been used a lot in literature. Examples of these models are the flow model as initiated by Kimemia and Gershwin 14 for modelling failure-prone manufacturing systems, the fluid models or fluid queues as proposed by queueing theorists 10 , or the stochastic fluid model as introduced by Cassandras et al 8 Recently, a new class of models for manufacturing systems has been introduced 2,3, 16 . In these models, the flow of products through a manufacturing system is modelled in a similar way as the flow of cars on a highway.…”
Section: Modelling Manufacturing Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative approach has been developed recently [1,2] extending concepts from gas dynamics and traffic theory to production flows (see also [20,14]). This approach not only will allow very fast simulations, it also allows for hierarchical models that, at least on their lowest levels, can be understood qualitatively, leading to insight into the dynamics of supply chains.…”
Section: Dynamics Of Supply Chainsmentioning
confidence: 99%