1991
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.43.2272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear dielectric response to a point-donor impurity of an electron-gas-model semiconductor that includes the effect of the Dirac-Slater exchange correlation

Abstract: The Thomas-Fermi statistical theory, including the Dirac-Slater local-density treatment of exchange correlation, has been applied to the problem of nonlinear screening of a donor point charge embedded in an electron-gas-model semiconductor. The nonlinear screening equation is solved numerically, giving spatial dielectric functions and screening radii with exchange-correlation strength and ion-charge state as parameters. Illustrations and tabulations of these results are given for five semiconductors, four ion … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From ( 5), ( 8) and ( 9), the ground-state energy and the bound-electron charge density are determined now in terms of the parameters Z, p and . A parallel calculation of β, E a and α in terms of the screened Coulomb form of ρ e (r) given by (6) shows that β = 4/7, while the only changes in ( 8) and ( 9) are the replacement of the numerical quantities 784b and 28b by 196c and 14c, respectively, where c is an abbreviation for (1/2)(3π/4) 2/3 (3/5) 7/3 (4/3). Not surprisingly, it is found in general (p = 1) that the exponential density distribution leads to atomic energies (screening lengths) that are less negative (smaller) than their screened Coulomb counterparts.…”
Section: Bound-electron Charge Density and Total Ground-state Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From ( 5), ( 8) and ( 9), the ground-state energy and the bound-electron charge density are determined now in terms of the parameters Z, p and . A parallel calculation of β, E a and α in terms of the screened Coulomb form of ρ e (r) given by (6) shows that β = 4/7, while the only changes in ( 8) and ( 9) are the replacement of the numerical quantities 784b and 28b by 196c and 14c, respectively, where c is an abbreviation for (1/2)(3π/4) 2/3 (3/5) 7/3 (4/3). Not surprisingly, it is found in general (p = 1) that the exponential density distribution leads to atomic energies (screening lengths) that are less negative (smaller) than their screened Coulomb counterparts.…”
Section: Bound-electron Charge Density and Total Ground-state Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, this statement coincides with the definition of V (r) given above in the context of the variational principle. Before proceeding to the TF and TFD theories of dielectric screening of statistical models of donor impurities, it is emphasized that the basic equations for n(r) and V (r) presented here are the same as those used in previous works [6,18] for the point-charge-impurity case of ( 14). The significant new feature here is the dependence of a nonpointlike v Z,p (r) on natural parameters identifying the donor atom or ion.…”
Section: Euler-lagrange and Poisson Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An atom, especially hydrogen, immersed into the otherwise homogeneous electron gas (EG) has been investigated for more than four decades not only in the density functional theory (DFT), mostly in its local-density approximation (LDA) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] , but also in various forms of many-body theories [15][16][17][18][19][20][21] , including diffusion Monte Carlo (DMC) 22 and variational Monte Carlo (VMC) 23 simulations. The primary motivation of those studies is to construct an appropriate theory for the nonlinear response of metallic electrons to an impurity point charge +Ze, but the basic physical concept with which they were concerned remains the same as that in the linear-response theory, known as Thomas-Fermi (TF) 24,25 (or Debye and Hückel 26 ) screening of the impurity charge with a short screening length λ TF which is about the same as k −1 F , where k F is the Fermi wave number of EG.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%