2011
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0000345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear Analysis of Shear-Critical Reinforced Concrete Beams Using Fixed Angle Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The design approach as specified in various Codes [1,2] suggests that the RC beam should be designed to fail in a ductile manner. Since the rupture of RC beam due to shear stress is a brittle one [3], consequently the shear capacity of the beam must be intended to be more conservative than the corresponding flexural strength. It means any excessive loads beyond the design load should lead to flexural type of failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The design approach as specified in various Codes [1,2] suggests that the RC beam should be designed to fail in a ductile manner. Since the rupture of RC beam due to shear stress is a brittle one [3], consequently the shear capacity of the beam must be intended to be more conservative than the corresponding flexural strength. It means any excessive loads beyond the design load should lead to flexural type of failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 5 compares the observed shear stress-shear strain behaviour of six beam specimens in series S1 and S2 of Lee et al [18] with the behaviour predicted by the SMM and RA-STM. The figure suggests that the proposed analysis method can trace the non-linear behaviour of sheardominated RC beams up to the point of failure more accurately than the RA-STM.…”
Section: Verification Of Proposed Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Section C-C is placed at a distance equal to the effective shear depth d ef of the beam from the maximum moment section. The effective shear depth d ef is taken as 0.9d [17,18], where d is the effective depth of the beam measured from the extreme compression fibre to the centroid of the outermost layer of tensile steel, see Fig. 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that the existing fixed-angle theories (Pang and Hsu 1996;Hsu and Zhang 1997) applied the compressive stress-strain relationships of concrete determined in the principal stress direction to that in the initial fixed-crack direction. Therefore, the stresses and strains calculated by these relationships gradually differ from the actual stresses and strains in the initial fixed-crack direction because the deviation angle ( β ) between the crack angle ( 2 α ) and the principal stress angle ( α ) increases as externally applied load inceases (Lee and Mansur 2006;Lee et al 2011). To take such a deviation angle into account in this study, the stresses and strains in the crack direction (direction 2-1) were calculated by transforming the stresses and strains in the principal direction (direction d-r) by the angle of β (refer to Figs.…”
Section: Tortional Behavior Model For Sfrc Membersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7. The initial value of β is taken as zero for calculations because the initial crack angle ( 2 α ) coincides with the principal stress angle ( α ) (Lee and Mansur 2006;Lee et al 2011). The stresses of concrete, steel bars, and steel fibers can be determined by selecting the average principal compressive strain ( d ε ) with assumed values of the average shear strain ( 12 γ ) and the average princi- …”
Section: Solution Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%