1995
DOI: 10.1063/1.359886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nondegenerate continuum model for polymer light-emitting diodes

Abstract: We present a device model to describe polymer light-emitting diodes (PLEDs) under bias conditions for which strong electrical injection does not occur (i.e., reverse, zero, and weak forward bias). The model is useful to interpret: capacitance–voltage measurements, which probe the charged trap density in the PLEDs; electroabsorption measurements on PLEDs, which probe the built-in electric field in the device; and internal photoemission measurements, which probe the effective Schottky barriers at the contacts of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such an explanation has already been reported in the literature, together with the observation of full depletion under reverse bias. [27][28][29] In spite of the high quality of the single crystal under analysis, this contribution cannot be excluded because of the inevitable damage done to the active layer by the deposition of the contact. However, the presence of defects at the metal-organic interface does not directly influence the device rectification properties, which are mostly related to the work function difference of the two electrodes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Such an explanation has already been reported in the literature, together with the observation of full depletion under reverse bias. [27][28][29] In spite of the high quality of the single crystal under analysis, this contribution cannot be excluded because of the inevitable damage done to the active layer by the deposition of the contact. However, the presence of defects at the metal-organic interface does not directly influence the device rectification properties, which are mostly related to the work function difference of the two electrodes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The potential difference between the electrodes at zero applied bias is called the built-in potential (V BI ). For those devices for which the electrodes work functions lie within the emitting polymer bipolaron gap, [14] and in the absence of pinning and of electric dipoles at polymer/electrode interface(s), eV BI (where e is the electron charge) is equal to the difference of the electrodes work function DW F . Generally, even when the two conditions above are not verified and interfacial dipoles are present V BI can still be expressed in terms of the polymer energy gap (E G ) and of the barrier heights at the polymer electrode interfaces (F B ) according to the following relation: [15] eV…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39,40 For the case where the organic layer is separated from the metal electrode by a thin insulating barrier, this behavior is interpreted with a model that assumes charge transfer across this barrier. 41,42,43 In this paper we study the dipole formation at interfaces of monolayers of PTCDA (3,4,9,10-perylenetetra-carboxylic-di-anhydride), perylene and benzene molecules adsorbed on close-packed metal surfaces of Au, Ag, Al, Mg and Ca by means of density functional theory (DFT) calculations. We have selected these surfaces because they have a similar and simple structure, as well as a simple electronic (free electron like) structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%