2002
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.138.10.1380-a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonablative Wrinkle Reduction: Treatment Results With a 585-nm Laser

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These include subsurfacing with both nonablative lasers and intense pulsed light systems, approaches whose efficacy has never been completely convincing, especially with regard to reduction of wrinkles alone. 4,10,11 Another strategy is single-or double-pass CO 2 laser resurfacing, which has been reported to result in more rapid reepithelialization, fewer and less severe adverse effects, and good prospects of success. [12][13][14][15][16] The postoperative adverse effects of ablative wrinkle treatment are not the only important consideration in regard to patient satisfaction; preventing intraoperative pain is also a major factor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These include subsurfacing with both nonablative lasers and intense pulsed light systems, approaches whose efficacy has never been completely convincing, especially with regard to reduction of wrinkles alone. 4,10,11 Another strategy is single-or double-pass CO 2 laser resurfacing, which has been reported to result in more rapid reepithelialization, fewer and less severe adverse effects, and good prospects of success. [12][13][14][15][16] The postoperative adverse effects of ablative wrinkle treatment are not the only important consideration in regard to patient satisfaction; preventing intraoperative pain is also a major factor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its efficacy, however, is currently the focus of heated debate among some authors. 4,10,22,23 In summary, the present method of using air cooling along with single-pass CO 2 laser skin resurfacing is an effective technique that can be ranked between multiple-pass ablative CO 2 or erbium:YAG laser skin resurfacing and subsurfacing in treating incipient and light perioral and periorbital wrinkles. Unlike conventional skin resurfacing and single-pass resurfacing with alternative forms of analgesics, our procedure clearly reduces intraoperative pain and postoperative adverse effects to an easily tolerated level.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Thus, in recent years, non-invasive and non-ablative procedures have attracted attention with the hope of achieving skin tightening effects close to those of ablative lasers while avoiding long recovery times and potential complications [9][10][11]. Nonablative rejuvenation (NAR) devices have been designed to induce thermal injury within the dermis without epidermal damage [12][13][14]. However, laser energy can be diffracted, absorbed, or scattered, resulting in suboptimal energy penetration [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-ablative wrinkle reduction (photorejuvenation type II) has most successfully been performed with long wavelength lasers [15][16][17][18], radiofrequency devices [19,20] or optical infrared devices [21,22], all with relatively little or no type I photorejuvenation effect reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%