2016
DOI: 10.1080/23802014.2016.1231012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Western small states: activists or survivors?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lee & Smith, 2010;Maoz, 2010;R. Keohane & Nye, 2011;Maass, 2014;Willem Honig, 2015;Gibert & Grzelczyk, 2016;James & James, 2017). Their advantages include geographic location, resource possession, industry dominance, and fewer constraints for international institutions, practices, responsibility, rules, expectations, and visibility than large nations (Gibert & Grzelczyk, 2016).…”
Section: Asymmetric Relations Between Weaker Nations and Large Powers...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lee & Smith, 2010;Maoz, 2010;R. Keohane & Nye, 2011;Maass, 2014;Willem Honig, 2015;Gibert & Grzelczyk, 2016;James & James, 2017). Their advantages include geographic location, resource possession, industry dominance, and fewer constraints for international institutions, practices, responsibility, rules, expectations, and visibility than large nations (Gibert & Grzelczyk, 2016).…”
Section: Asymmetric Relations Between Weaker Nations and Large Powers...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The treaty enables both states to discuss the JMA diplomatically. The 'Joint Commission' established eases the "coordination and management of the exploration, conservation and development of the living and non-living resources of the seabed in the area" (Ernesta, 2018;Flynn 2022;Gibert and Grzelczyk. 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…44 The new wave of small state authors emphasize the agency of such actors, going beyond their conceptualization as disposable players in the international system. Gibert and Grzelczyk (2017) critique the overall academic endeavors on small states for portraying them as passive participants; they argue that "small 42 Caroline Howard Grøn and Anders Wivel, "Maximizing Affairs, Vol. 19, no.4 (2006), 651-668; Anders Wivel (2005), "The Security Challenge of Small EU Member States: Interests, Identity and the Development of the EU as a Security Actor," Journal of Common Market Studies,Vol.43,no.2,[393][394][395][396][397][398][399][400][401][402][403][404][405][406][407][408][409][410][411][412] Marie V Gibert and Virginie Grzelczyk, "Non-Western Small States : Activists or Survivors ?," Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal 1, no.…”
Section: David Vital the Inequality Of States: A Study Of The Small mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given this impediment, small states use nonconventional means wherein military force becomes less acceptable; instead, there is greater emphasis on interdependence, norms, and institutions. 53 While Gibert and Grzelczyk (2017) criticized the limits of studying small states within institutional frameworks, Long conceptualizes such behavior as an expression of the small states' agency, which is extremely limited outside of institutional frameworks that are guided by interdependence and norms.…”
Section: David Vital the Inequality Of States: A Study Of The Small mentioning
confidence: 99%