2014 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/cec.2014.6900621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-uniform mapping in real-coded genetic algorithms

Abstract: Genetic algorithms have been used as an optimization tool using evolutionary strategies. Genetic algorithms cover three basic steps for population refinement selection, cross-over and mutation. In normal Real-coded genetic algorithm(RGA), the population of real variables generated after population refinement operations, is used for the computation of the objective function. In this paper we have shown the effect made by mapping the refined population towards better solutions and thereby creating more biased se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also provide a comparison of the top 3 NLopt algorithms (A11, A13 and A14) on the CEC 2014 benchmarks with other reference algorithms. These include the United Multi-Operator Evolutionary Algorithms (UMOEA) [13], Success-History based Adaptive Differential Evolution using linear population size reduction (L-SHADE) [58], Differential Evolution with Replacement Strategy (RSDE) [69], Memetic Differential Evolution Based on Fitness Euclidean-Distance Ratio (FERDE) [49], Partial Opposition-Based Adaptive Differential Evolution (POBL-ADE) [23], Mean-Variance Mapping Optimization (MVMO) [14], rmalschcma [39], Opt Bees [38], Fireworks Algorithm with Differential Mutation (FWA-DE) [72], Non-uniform Real-coded Genetic Algorithm (NRGA) [71], b3e3pbest [5] and DE b6e6rl [43].…”
Section: Results On Cec 2014 Benchmarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also provide a comparison of the top 3 NLopt algorithms (A11, A13 and A14) on the CEC 2014 benchmarks with other reference algorithms. These include the United Multi-Operator Evolutionary Algorithms (UMOEA) [13], Success-History based Adaptive Differential Evolution using linear population size reduction (L-SHADE) [58], Differential Evolution with Replacement Strategy (RSDE) [69], Memetic Differential Evolution Based on Fitness Euclidean-Distance Ratio (FERDE) [49], Partial Opposition-Based Adaptive Differential Evolution (POBL-ADE) [23], Mean-Variance Mapping Optimization (MVMO) [14], rmalschcma [39], Opt Bees [38], Fireworks Algorithm with Differential Mutation (FWA-DE) [72], Non-uniform Real-coded Genetic Algorithm (NRGA) [71], b3e3pbest [5] and DE b6e6rl [43].…”
Section: Results On Cec 2014 Benchmarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include the United Multi-Operator Evolutionary Algorithms (UMOEA) [13], Success-History based Adaptive Differential Evolution using linear population size reduction (L-SHADE) [58], Differential Evolution with Replacement Strategy (RSDE) [69], Memetic Differential Evolution Based on Fitness Euclidean-Distance Ratio (FERDE) [49], Partial Opposition-Based Adaptive Differential Evolution (POBL-ADE) [23], Mean-Variance Mapping Optimization (MVMO) [14], rmalschcma [39], Opt Bees [38], Fireworks Algorithm with Differential Mutation (FWA-DE) [72], Non-uniform Real-coded Genetic Algorithm (NRGA) [71], b3e3pbest [5] and DE b6e6rl [43].…”
Section: Results On Cec 2014 Benchmarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct experiments 3 have shown the limits of GSP regarding the imaging perspective. We estimate the acceptable grid dimensions under ASML scanner boundaries and restrictions using imaging simulations.…”
Section: Imaging Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%