Abstract:Starting from the (q, p) 5-brane solution of type-IIB string theory, we here construct the low energy configuration corresponding to (NS5, Dp)-brane bound states (for 0 ≤ p ≤ 4) using the T-duality map between type-IIB and type-IIA string theories. We use the SL(2, Z) symmetry on the type-IIB bound state (NS5, D3) to construct (NS5, D5, D3) bound state. We then apply T-duality transformation again on this state to construct the bound states of the form (NS5, D(p + 2), Dp) (for 0 ≤ p ≤ 2) of both type-IIB and type-IIA string theories. We give the tension formula for these states and show that they form non-threshold bound states. All these states preserve half of the space-time supersymmetries of string theories. We also briefly discuss the ODp-limits corresponding to (NS5, Dp) bound state solutions.Keywords: Superstrings and Heterotic Strings, p-branes, D-branes.JHEP02 (2001) [6,7]. This solution is non-singular and purely solitonic and therefore, not much is known about its dynamics. Type II string theories also contain Dpbranes [8,9] in their low energy spectrum and it is well-known that Dp-branes can end on type-IIA NS5-branes for p = even and they can end on type-IIB NS5-branes for p = odd. It is therefore expected that these Dp-branes will form bound states with NS5-branes. The bound state (NS5, D5) of type-IIB theory known as (q, p) fivebranes, with q, p relatively prime integers corresponding to the charges of NS5-branes and D5-branes respectively has already been constructed in ref. [10]. We here use this solution and apply the T-duality map from type-IIB to type-IIA theory also from type IIA to type-IIB theory to construct the (NS5, Dp) bound state solutions for 0 ≤ p ≤ 4. The T-duality is applied along the longitudinal directions of D5-branes. We note that the (NS5, Dp) bound states have also been given in [11,12] and they were obtained from (NS5, D1) solution (constructed by applying S-duality on already known [13] (F, D5) solution) and applying T-duality along the transverse directions of D-string. However, the (NS5, D5) solution obtained in this way does not agree with the already known solution. We have indicated the possible reason for this discrepancy in section 2. This is the reason we have chosen to start from the known (NS5, D5) solution to construct the (NS5, Dp) solutions. In order to construct (NS5, D(p + 2), Dp) bound states for 0 ≤ p ≤ 3, we start from (NS5, D3) solution of type-IIB string theory. Since type-IIB string theory is conjectured to have a non-perturbative quantum SL(2, Z) symmetry, we use this