Non-state nations: Structure, rescaling, and the role of territorial policy communities, illustrated by the cases of Wales and Sardinia

Abstract

This paper explores the role of non-state nations' identity and agency with regard to relations with their host nation states. The particular focus here is on the means by which such regions might express their individuality. To this end, we employ a comparative case study analysis of two non-state nations with a range of differing yet in other ways similar qualities-namely Wales (UK) and Sardinia (Italy). We suggest that this is a valuable exercise, allowing as it does for the exploring of evidence 'on the ground' of the processes involved. The conceptual rationale for the paper is provided by new regionalism-regions as actors beyond the nation state. Following this, the idea of the 'territorial policy community' is presented as a point of departure, with the scope of the paper being to develop a diachronic framework for regional change. Given the focus on identity and interest articulation, the role of regional political parties is a particular subject of the empirical investigation, with non-state nations and nation states linked by opportunistic relationships based on political and electoral support. We then consider what this might mean with regard to the capacity of non-state nations to build on the past to successfully negotiate future policy-making agendas. Finally, we reflect on the limitations of the study, and consider the implications of its findings for further research agendas.

Applying the ecosystem model in a new context? The case of business incubation in Oman

“…This has, of course, led to an interest in policy approaches that have proved successful elsewhere before adoption in the Oman context. The tensions or pitfalls of policy transfer across different contexts are already documented (Bok & Coe, 2017; Clifton & Usai, 2019; McCann, 2011), but there continues to be an understandably strong interest in trying to incorporate “best practice” into national and regional approaches.…”

Emancipatory Urban Citizenship Regimes in Postpandemic Catalonia, Scotland, and Wales

“…Here, there is the relation of previous research published work by the author per topic and case study that is used to construct the case study methodology: 'right to decide' (Calzada 2014), 'constitutional arrangements' (Calzada and Bildarratz 2015), 'smart devolution' (Calzada 2017), Scotland and Catalonia (Calzada 2018a(Calzada , 2019, and 'rescaling nation-states' (Calzada 2022a(Calzada , 2022b(Calzada , 2022c. The case study methodology in this article aims not only to update the case study of Catalonia-Barcelona and Scotland-Glasgow given that both cases present interesting updates but also to introduce a new (and less known) emerging player: Wales-Cardiff (Clifton and Alessia 2018;Welsh Government 2021;Wyn Jones and Larner 2021). The three cases show how rescaling is occurring by depicting such a distinct pathway.…”

Territorial rescaling and polycentric governance in Albania

“…With its rigid boundaries, type I cannot solve relational territorial problems, requiring ubiquitous type II arrangements -network-like, with overlapping memberships, locally and across levels. As territorial rescaling that implicates type I cannot perform the role of type II, the two systems must coexist and interact in a network of 'policy communities' (Clifton and Usai, 2018;Keating, 2014), embracing the conditions of polycentricity (Van Zeben, 2019;Carlisle and Gruby, 2017;Aligica and Tarko, 2012), and seeking territorial constructs that materialise the interests behind interactions. In this process, the policy communities must overcome multi-level governance gaps (OECD 2016(OECD , 2011, which emphasise the necessity for cross-scales and cross-actors cooperation, revealing a new gap, i.e., that of polycentricity.…”