2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11511-012-0088-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-realizability and ending laminations: Proof of the density conjecture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
61
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…j / actually represent ending laminations of ends of .M / 0 (Proposition 6.5). A similar result on the equivalence of being unrealisable and representing an ending lamination was given independently by Namazi and Souto [43] as we mentioned in the Introduction (Section 1).…”
Section: Unrealisable Laminations and Ending Laminationssupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…j / actually represent ending laminations of ends of .M / 0 (Proposition 6.5). A similar result on the equivalence of being unrealisable and representing an ending lamination was given independently by Namazi and Souto [43] as we mentioned in the Introduction (Section 1).…”
Section: Unrealisable Laminations and Ending Laminationssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…We note that Namazi and Souto also have given a proof of this latter step in [43], and have proved the Bers-Sullivan-Thurston density conjecture independently of our work.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…By Lemma 20, ρ cannot be separable-stable, as any simple closed curve on B is separable. Since purely hyperbolic points are dense in C − C ( [12], Lemma 4.2, [34], [35]), this completes the proof.…”
Section: Other Homeomorphism Types In Ah(m )mentioning
confidence: 56%
“…This was proven first by Y. Minsky [15] for representations of punctured torus groups, and, hence, in the Maskit slice, which suffices for our purposes. The general case is due to the work of many people, most notably, K. Bromberg [4], J. Brock and K. Bromberg [2], H. Namazi and J. Souto [18], and K. Ohshika [19]. We, thus, have: Proposition 7.…”
Section: Theorem 1 Chapter 2]mentioning
confidence: 94%