2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10880-007-9090-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-pharmacologic Interventions for CFS: A Randomized Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
168
2
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
1
168
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, some individuals with CFS and FM exhibit relatively high-activity levels with respect to employment, family obligations, and other responsibilities. Recent studies of CFS (e.g., Friedberg & Sohl, 2009b;Jason et al, 2007) suggest a wide range of functioning. Because rates of employment and disability vary considerably in studies of CFS and FM (Reisine, Fifield, Walsh, & Feinn, 2003;Ross et al, 2004), generalizations may convey inaccurate impressions of functional status.…”
Section: Measuring Physical Functioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, some individuals with CFS and FM exhibit relatively high-activity levels with respect to employment, family obligations, and other responsibilities. Recent studies of CFS (e.g., Friedberg & Sohl, 2009b;Jason et al, 2007) suggest a wide range of functioning. Because rates of employment and disability vary considerably in studies of CFS and FM (Reisine, Fifield, Walsh, & Feinn, 2003;Ross et al, 2004), generalizations may convey inaccurate impressions of functional status.…”
Section: Measuring Physical Functioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using both severity groupings, no significant differences were found between the participants in more severe and less severe categories based on age, gender, ethnicity, education level, and socioeconomic status (more information about the sample characteristics is reported elsewhere, [35]). There were 8 participants who were categorized as more severe and 63 were categorized as less severe by both methods; however, there were inconsistencies on categorization for 31 participants (17 categorized as less severe on actigraphy were categorized as more severe on self-report measures; 14 categorized as more severe on actigraphy were categorized as less severe on self-report measures), suggesting that these two criteria capture somewhat different subgroups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Jason et al (2007), who used a different design, failed to replicate the results obtained in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands (summarised in Bagnall et al, 2007, Table 1). There are also other factors, notably the selection of patients using broadcase definitions, which may explain the similar results reported in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands (Malouff et al, 2008).…”
Section: Responses To Criticisms and Possible Counter-argumentsmentioning
confidence: 98%