2014 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/glocomw.2014.7063551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-orthogonal compute-and-forward with joint lattice decoding for the multiple-access relay channel

Abstract: Relay-aided multiuser communications are crucial for future 5G systems. In this paper, we consider the twouser multiple access relay channel (MARC), in which two users transmit messages to a common destination with the assistance of a half-duplex relay. The decode-and-forward (DF) based lattice coding was shown to be effective for the MARC in our previous work [1]. However when the links from the users to the relay are weak, DF protocol may fail to decode all users at the relay. Aiming to solve this problem, w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(97 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results reveal that CP&F shows better performance than lattice-based C&F. This work is later extended to a multi-user multi-relay cooperative scenario in [101]. Cooperative networks are also considered in [102]- [106]. The authors in [103], [104], [106] propose an CP&F method for the two transmitter single relay two receiver networks.…”
Section: Sum Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results reveal that CP&F shows better performance than lattice-based C&F. This work is later extended to a multi-user multi-relay cooperative scenario in [101]. Cooperative networks are also considered in [102]- [106]. The authors in [103], [104], [106] propose an CP&F method for the two transmitter single relay two receiver networks.…”
Section: Sum Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors in [103], [104], [106] propose an CP&F method for the two transmitter single relay two receiver networks. The CP&F is considered for the same scenario with single receiver in [102], [105].…”
Section: Sum Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results reveal that CP&F shows better performance than lattice-based C&F. This work is later extended to a multi-user multi-relay cooperative scenario in [62]. Cooperative networks are also considered in [63]- [67]. The authors in [64], [65], [67] propose an CP&F method for the two transmitter single relay two receiver networks.…”
Section: Sum Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors in [64], [65], [67] propose an CP&F method for the two transmitter single relay two receiver networks. The CP&F is considered for the same scenario with single receiver in [63], [66].…”
Section: Sum Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%