2013
DOI: 10.1109/mcom.2013.6588654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-line-of-sight small cell backhauling using microwave technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results indicate that in HetNets the backhaul network represents a considerable portion of the TCO, while in homogeneous networks, based on macro BSs only, the backhaul cost does not affect significantly the TCO. In [10] the authors evaluated a microwave-based backhaul network for small cells in terms of cost-efficiency and time required for deployment. Their results showed that point-to-point microwave is a costefficient technology to provide high backhaul capacity in short deployment times.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results indicate that in HetNets the backhaul network represents a considerable portion of the TCO, while in homogeneous networks, based on macro BSs only, the backhaul cost does not affect significantly the TCO. In [10] the authors evaluated a microwave-based backhaul network for small cells in terms of cost-efficiency and time required for deployment. Their results showed that point-to-point microwave is a costefficient technology to provide high backhaul capacity in short deployment times.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the backhaul capacity should be able to support the busy hour traffic and have enough margin to cover its future growth and statistical variation [10]. In wireless backhaul, the available bandwidth, share of radio resources and modulation scheme (and hence SINR) impact the backhaul capacity.…”
Section: Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dimensioning the backhaul network for the busy time mean cell throughput will result in a reduced cost, since it is always lower than the quiet time peak cell throughput, but may prevent operators to exploit the full benefit of small cells. The minimum target today in order to backhaul LTE small cells is around 50 Mbps, and 150 Mbps or higher capacities are required to support peak data rates [10]. These numbers are expected to grow as multiple radio access technologies and additional spectrum become available for small cells.…”
Section: Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…in [1] proposed mm-Wave solution for nonLine-of-Sight (nLoS) applications where it is claimed that Quality of Service (QoS) increases by pointing receiver antenna to the direction of best approaching reflected ray. 73GHz band has shown better atmospheric absorption characteristics compared to the 60GHz frequency band for wideband connections [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%