2017
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd004104.pub4
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Non-invasive ventilation for the management of acute hypercapnic respiratory failure due to exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Abstract: Data from good quality randomised controlled trials show that NIV is beneficial as a first-line intervention in conjunction with usual care for reducing the likelihood of mortality and endotracheal intubation in patients admitted with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure secondary to an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The magnitude of benefit for these outcomes appears similar for patients with acidosis of a mild (pH 7.30 to 7.35) versus a more severe nature (pH < 7.30), an… Show more

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
302
90
72
7

Citation Types

7
345
1
25

Year Published

Range
2000
2000
2026
2026

Publication Types

Select...
401
23
11
8

Relationship

1
442

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 443 publications

(378 citation statements)
references

References 140 publications

7
345
1
25
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Both groups showed substantial improvements in PaO 2 and PaCO 2 levels, underscoring the efficacy of BiPAP as a critical intervention for acute hypercapnic respiratory failure. These results are consistent with existing literature that documents the benefits of BiPAP in enhancing gas exchange and reducing the need for more invasive interventions (Osadnik et al 2017;Akhter and Rizvi 2017). However, most cited studies and our own findings are limited by relatively short follow-up intervals.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…These results are consistent with existing literature that documents the benefits of BiPAP in enhancing gas exchange and reducing the need for more invasive interventions (Osadnik et al. 2017 ; Akhter and Rizvi 2017 ). However, most cited studies and our own findings are limited by relatively short follow‐up intervals.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation