Nonholonomic Motion Planning 1993
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-3176-0_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-holonomic Kinematics and the Role of Elliptic Functions in Constructive Controllability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
79
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
79
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For the case of m = 2, Brockett and Dai [14] have shown that the optimal inputs are elliptic functions (see also the next section). However, we can extend Algorithm 1 to this case as follows: 2.…”
Section: Second-order Controllable Systemsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For the case of m = 2, Brockett and Dai [14] have shown that the optimal inputs are elliptic functions (see also the next section). However, we can extend Algorithm 1 to this case as follows: 2.…”
Section: Second-order Controllable Systemsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Much of the inspiration and key insight into the rich history of the problem are found in the work of Jurdjevic [17], which includes a more general geometric version of the necessary condition derivation in Chapter 4. The work of Brockett [7] details the role of elliptic integrals and functions in deriving closed form solutions to optimal control problems of this kind.…”
Section: Optimal Path Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…we can use a nonlinear static state feedback in order to further simplify (8). Define the control input τ as…”
Section: Qmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More in general, this is another example of the minimalistic trend in the field of robotics, aimed at designing devices of reduced complexity for performing complex tasks. The archetype of rolling manipulation is the plate-ball system [31,27,24,8]: the ball (the manipulated object) can be brought to any contact configuration by maneuvering the upper plate (the first finger), while the lower plate (the second finger) is fixed. Despite its mechanical simplicity, the planning and control problems for this device already raise challenging theoretical issues.…”
Section: The Plate-ball Manipulation Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%