2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.annale.2022.100034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nomadic livelihood resilience through tourism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Tantray and H. A. Mir (2021), in their study of traditional and modern society, concluded that there is a need to preserve traditional values and social ties in contemporary society to achieve a balance between tradition and modernity. When examining the living conditions, as F. Shekari et al (2022) observe, traditional societies do not disappear, but rather undergo transformations in various aspects due to the impact of external factors or changes in internal circumstances. Moreover, this researcher focused on the impact of globalization on the transformation of modern Kyrgyz' food culture, establishing that Kyrgyz nomads underwent several changes in the life system from the middle of the 19th century to 2021, from a nomadic life to a semi-nomadic and sedentary one.…”
Section: -19mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tantray and H. A. Mir (2021), in their study of traditional and modern society, concluded that there is a need to preserve traditional values and social ties in contemporary society to achieve a balance between tradition and modernity. When examining the living conditions, as F. Shekari et al (2022) observe, traditional societies do not disappear, but rather undergo transformations in various aspects due to the impact of external factors or changes in internal circumstances. Moreover, this researcher focused on the impact of globalization on the transformation of modern Kyrgyz' food culture, establishing that Kyrgyz nomads underwent several changes in the life system from the middle of the 19th century to 2021, from a nomadic life to a semi-nomadic and sedentary one.…”
Section: -19mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the changes and mutations that the world has experienced in recent years, livelihood resilience is becoming a serious concern for researchers and even managers, especially in the tourism sector [90]. Livelihood resilience can be defined as the adaptability of actors and their abilities to take advantage of disturbances to improve their situation and preserve their way of life [9,48,58,90,92,101,124]. Requirements such as human agency, empowerment, independence, and access to resources are necessary for this resilience.…”
Section: Livelihood Resiliencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…杨 钊 1,2 , 朱其静 1,2 , 刘昌琪 1,2 , 王盼盼 1,2 , 王 倩 1,2 , 刘少杰 旅游对消除地区贫困、提高人类福祉的重要作用已被国内外广泛证实 [1,2] ,旅游廊道 是推动旅游地产业要素空间传导、旅游核心边缘地区共享发展益处的重要抓手 [3] 。廊道概 念源于生态学领域 [4] ,是集旅游、交通、生态、景观、扶贫等多重功能于一身并可以产生 经济、休闲、交通等叠加效应的线型空间 [5] 。随着自驾车普及和休闲需求增加,在中国广 大山地、滨水和乡村等地涌现多条旅游廊道,作为一种新型旅游目的地和遍在性休闲载 体 [3] ,在疫情防控常态化背景下以其开放性、原真性和安全性备受欢迎。相比传统旅游景 区,廊道旅游地作为一个"域"的引流和过夜消费功能明显 [6] ,因其更大空间延展、更广 人员参与、更丰富产品供给等特征,带动沿线村镇基础设施、人居环境、产业结构提升 和居民生计转型,具有更强的稳定性和共享性,是实现乡村振兴和共同富裕的重要抓 手。然而,廊道旅游地作为一个人地耦合的社会-生态系统,其分布与贫困地区、生态 脆弱地具有高度的地理重叠性,旅游发展带来的人地关系矛盾也相伴而生,在增加沿线 农户生计资本的同时不可避免地面临社会、生态等脆弱性问题,但已有研究关注较少。 脆弱性研究是全球变化和可持续性发展领域关注的热点问题 [7] ,起源于气候灾害学 [8] , 广泛应用于自然、社会、经济等领域 [9] ,已从概念、方法、理论层面探讨转入实证研究阶 段 [10] ;研究成果主要集中在生态环境脆弱性和灾害脆弱性等方面 [11] ,以人地关系为核心 的社会-生态脆弱性研究相对滞后 [12] 。农户生计问题一直是可持续发展的核心议题 [13] , 收稿日期:2022-06-27;修订日期:2022-11-21 基金项目:国家社会科学基金项目 (20FGLB074) 作者简介:杨钊 (1974-) ,男,安徽芜湖人,博士,教授,博士生导师,研究方向为旅游地理与人口地理。 E-mail: yangzhao@mail.ahnu.edu.cn 自 然 资 源 学 报 生计脆弱性背景受到发展趋势、冲击和季节性干扰,与生计资本、生计结构和过程转 变、生计策略和生计结果构成可持续生计框架五大部分 [14] ,是可持续生计框架中最难改 变的部分,其作为分析工具运用在不同案例时内涵各不相同 [15] 。国内外对农户生计脆弱 性研究主要围绕生计风险 [16,17] 、生计敏感性 [18,19] 和生计适应能力 [9,20,21] ,其中生计风险通常 包括自然灾害、环境危机、经济波动、政策改变、突发事故等 [22] ,生计敏感性包括政 策、气候等变化带来的影响 [7,18] ,生计适应能力包括技能培训次数、房屋资产、借贷款难 易程度、家庭社会网络关系等 [23] 。乡村旅游在推动旅游地生计可持续发展的同时 [24] ,受 生计背景变化的影响 [25] ,而生计脆弱性在一定程度上能够有效识别旅游地农户所面临的 生计风险和内部隐患 [19] 。旅游地农户生计脆弱性及其应对在乡村振兴和共同富裕背景下 逐步成为热点内容 [16,21] ,其研究较多基于可持续生计框架,案例地较多选取景区 [26,27] 、生 态环境脆弱区或自然保护区 [16,28] ,研究视角从早期的减贫研究 [29] 延伸到社会-生态系统领 域…”
Section: 共同富裕目标下廊道旅游地农户生计的 脆弱性变化及其调控unclassified