2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2012.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noise and emission targeted economic trade-off for next generation single-aisle aircraft

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with the costs of greenhouse gases, the costs of harmful gases HC, CO, and NO x are more uniform. The calculation formula for the emission costs of harmful gases is proposed by Phleps and Hornung [11]: (35) Cost (36) where Cost HC , Cost CO , and Cost No x are emission costs of HC, CO, and NO x (e),C U = 4 (e/t) is the harmful gas emission cost coefficient and f emission = 15.9% is the percentage of the flights affected by emission charges. Therefore, the model of the harmful gas cost is:…”
Section: ) Greenhouse Gas Costmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared with the costs of greenhouse gases, the costs of harmful gases HC, CO, and NO x are more uniform. The calculation formula for the emission costs of harmful gases is proposed by Phleps and Hornung [11]: (35) Cost (36) where Cost HC , Cost CO , and Cost No x are emission costs of HC, CO, and NO x (e),C U = 4 (e/t) is the harmful gas emission cost coefficient and f emission = 15.9% is the percentage of the flights affected by emission charges. Therefore, the model of the harmful gas cost is:…”
Section: ) Greenhouse Gas Costmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wei and Wang took into account the influence of atmospheric environment and flight parameters, correcting the emission indices of CO 2 , NO x , CO, and HC generated during flight and assessing the emissions of pollutants at each stage [10]. Phleps and Hornung proposed a method to calculate the emission cost of noxious gas [11]. Soler et al proposed a method for calculating the cost of the contrail [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each scenario is to be treated as equally plausible, if not, the scenario study would not be effective when working with conditions that are not going to be taken seriously. The approach to scenario building depicted here used at the Institute of Aircraft Design of the Technical University of Munich (TUM) has been successfully applied in several foresight projects, see Kuhlmann [10][11][12] This approach has been adapted from the work of Gausemeier et al, one of the early pioneering German literature having wide-ranging influences in the practical implementation of the explorative scenario methodology in business and industry. 13 Gausemeier et al broke down the scenario building process into five phases, namely the scenario preparation phase, which defines the "investigative object" of the scenario project and the time horizon of the project.…”
Section: B the Use Of Scenario Planning In Strategic Foresightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, in this section, a specific approach to scenario building is depicted that has been applied successfully in several scenario projects held at the Institute of Aircraft Design of the Technical University of Munich (TUM), see Kuhlmann et al (2009), Phleps and Hornung (2013), and Randt and Ö ttl (2013) for examples. In view of the positive experience and quality of the results obtained through this approach, it has actually proven to be working well in real-life application cases.…”
Section: Building Multiple Future Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%