1989
DOI: 10.1016/s0090-2616(89)80024-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No laughing matter: Patterns of humor in the workplace

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0
3

Year Published

1992
1992
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
44
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Humour mitigates the authoritarian tone of directives from managers to subordinates, which lessens perceived threats to the subordinate's self-esteem and dignity (Duncan 1982). Managers can also appear more human and "real" by using self-deprecating humour judiciously (Duncan & Feisal 1990). Cooper (2008) suggests that humour is also employed by individuals to ingratiate themselves with peers, subordinates, or managers.…”
Section: Humour At Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Humour mitigates the authoritarian tone of directives from managers to subordinates, which lessens perceived threats to the subordinate's self-esteem and dignity (Duncan 1982). Managers can also appear more human and "real" by using self-deprecating humour judiciously (Duncan & Feisal 1990). Cooper (2008) suggests that humour is also employed by individuals to ingratiate themselves with peers, subordinates, or managers.…”
Section: Humour At Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Popular business magazines and books (Duncan & Feisal, 1989;Kushner, 1990) promote humour at working place. Certain authors claim (Gibson, 1994) that humour at work increases the feeling of self-control and improves the control of the employees by the manager in the terms of motivation and productivity improvement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dentro dessa perspectiva, o uso do humor em empresas tem sido associado ao aumento da moral entre os trabalhadores (Grunner, 1997), à criação de uma cultura organizacional mais positiva (Clouse e Spurgeon, 1995), à melhoria da coesão de grupos (Duncan, 1982), à redução de conflitos nas empresas (Duncan et al, 1990;Abramis, 1992;Rothwell, 1996;Smith et al, 2000), à facilitação da expressão de emoções negativas (Martineau, 1972;Pollio, 1995), à canalização da hostilidade (Wilson, 1979), à manutenção da ordem social (Dwyer, 1991), ao estímulo da criatividade individual e grupal (Csikszentmihaly, 1996;Murdock e Ganim,1993), ao aumento da motivação (Crawford, 1994;Dienstbier, 1995;Lippitt, 1982), ao incremento da produtividade (Clouse e Spurgeon, 1995;Duncan e Feisal, 1989;Avolio et al, 1999), ao aumento da eficácia de processos de mudanças nas empresas (Bovey, 2001;Kahn, 1989), ao estímulo de novas perspectivas (Dixon, 1980), ao estímulo ao comprometimento no grupo (Duncan, 1982;Martin e Lefcourt, 1983;Ziv e Gadish, 1990), e ao estímulo do aprendizado e do desenvolvimento (Boverie et al, 1994).…”
Section: Thomaz Wood Jr and Miguel P Caldasunclassified