No-Fault Compensation for Medical Injuries

Abstract

Leading patient safety proposals promote the design and implementation of error prevention strategies that target systems used to deliver care and eschew individual blame. They also call for candor among practitioners about the causes and consequences of medical injury. Both goals collide with fundamental tenets of the medical malpractice system. Thus, the challenge of addressing error in medicine demands a thorough reconsideration of the legal mechanisms currently used to deal with harms in health care. In this article, we describe an alternative to litigation that does not predicate compensation on proof of practitioner fault, suggest how it might be operationalized, and argue that there is a pressing need to test its promise. We tackle traditional criticisms of "no-fault" compensation systems for medical injury-specifically, concerns about their cost and the presumption that eliminating liability will dilute incentives to deliver high-quality care. Our recent empirical work suggests that a model designed around avoidable or preventable injuries, as opposed to negligent ones, would not exceed the costs of current malpractice systems in the United States. Implementation of such a model promises to promote quality by harmonizing injury compensation with patient safety objectives, especially if it is linked to reforms that make institutions, rather than individuals, primarily answerable for injuries.

Programme of triple-I mediator education (TIME) to improve medical disputes in clinical settings in Taiwan: a Delphi study

“…Damage caused by those with no liability could be dealt with through compensation. 31 Common access points to humanitarian relief include Taiwan’s drug injury relief system, compensation for vaccine injuries and childbirth accident relief.…”

“…For those with legal liability for any damage they cause, legal remedies affirm the validity of their claims and requests. Damage caused by those with no liability could be dealt with through compensation 31. Common access points to humanitarian relief include Taiwan’s drug injury relief system, compensation for vaccine injuries and childbirth accident relief.…”

Outcome of Adverse Events and Medical Errors in the Intensive Care Unit

“…report other colleagues as some of the barriers to disclosure and handling MEs/AEs; they also place emphasis on making suitable organizational reforms to have a disclosure policy in place. As suggested by Studdert et al, 33 the fear of litigation poses a substantial obstacle to transparency. However, others discussed the importance of communication and disclosure as being most crucial to liability reduction and strengthening the physician-patient relationship.…”

Identification of doctors at risk of recurrent complaints: a national study of healthcare complaints in Australia

“…They remain essentially reactive enterprises, with workloads that focus on dealing with the fallout from care that has gone wrong. Patient safety experts regard the medico-legal system's fixation with posthoc assessments of individual behaviour, rather than prevention and systems, as anachronistic 49. But as Rolph recognised 30 years ago,11 methods for accurately and reliably forecasting the medico-legal risk of clinicians have transformative potential because they could focus and drive prevention.…”