2001
DOI: 10.1023/a:1011974813551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The development of biofi lm on bark did not in-crease its consumption by invertebrates (Hax & Golladay 1993, Friberg & Jacobsen 1994. Whether this was a result of the substrata (bark + biofi lm) poor quality, toxicity (Canhoto & Graça 1999, McKie & Cranston 2001 or/and a consequence of the presence of a high quality resource in the stream -alder leaves -is unclear . Nonetheless, present evidence suggests a dominant physical and microbial degradative pathway for both eucalyptus leaves and bark, with macroinvertebrate processing playing a minor role.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The development of biofi lm on bark did not in-crease its consumption by invertebrates (Hax & Golladay 1993, Friberg & Jacobsen 1994. Whether this was a result of the substrata (bark + biofi lm) poor quality, toxicity (Canhoto & Graça 1999, McKie & Cranston 2001 or/and a consequence of the presence of a high quality resource in the stream -alder leaves -is unclear . Nonetheless, present evidence suggests a dominant physical and microbial degradative pathway for both eucalyptus leaves and bark, with macroinvertebrate processing playing a minor role.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Community metrics recorded during field surveys therefore might not only reflect in-stream habitat conditions, but also the state of the surrounding terrestrial environment that provides the streams with colonists (Arnaiz et al, 2011;Collier, 1995;Moraes et al, 2014). If the riparian area is impaired or not fully natural, there may not be sufficient insects in their adult, terrestrial stages to produce eggs and aquatic larvae to colonise the stream bed even when wood may have created complex and favourable in-stream habitats (Jähnig et al, 2010;McKie & Cranston, 2001). This may have been the case in the upper River Cover catchment as the study tributaries were all draining homogeneous moors and conifer plantations, which were found to accommodate a limited diversity of macroinvertebrates (Ormerod et al, 1993).…”
Section: Benthic Macroinvertebratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These structural measures capture variation in the composition and distribution of benthic invertebrate communities, and sometimes include information about their functional traits, and thus are widely used to assess the current ecological status of habitats and to track changes in status as management measures are applied (Burdon et al, 2020;Dahl & Johnson, 2004). Inferences of ecosystem level impacts (e.g., on ecosystem processes regulating fluxes of nutrients and energy) from these structural measurements are possible-for example a decline in abundance or diversity of invertebrates consuming algal biofilms might indicate a reduction in the importance of algae as an energy source in that system (McKie & Cranston, 2001). However, such inferences should always be heavily qualified because underlying assumptions simplify the ecological complexity of the system studied.…”
Section: From Analyses Of Structure To Functional Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%