2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00521-018-3685-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NMF with local constraint and Deep NMF with temporal dependencies constraint for action recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before, many grouping strategies on the single view data have been proposed. Ordinarily, these current single-see gathering approaches can be by and large isolated into three characterizations, specifically piece bunching approaches [22][23][24], supernatural grouping approaches [25][26][27], and subspace grouping approaches [28,29]. Part gathering approaches commonly use bit abilities to design the main commitments to a high dimensional piece space where grouping can be performed capably.…”
Section: Review Of Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Before, many grouping strategies on the single view data have been proposed. Ordinarily, these current single-see gathering approaches can be by and large isolated into three characterizations, specifically piece bunching approaches [22][23][24], supernatural grouping approaches [25][26][27], and subspace grouping approaches [28,29]. Part gathering approaches commonly use bit abilities to design the main commitments to a high dimensional piece space where grouping can be performed capably.…”
Section: Review Of Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Part gathering approaches commonly use bit abilities to design the main commitments to a high dimensional piece space where grouping can be performed capably. For example, M. Tong et al [25] use a Gaussian piece to design the commitments to a divided space and wire pair savvy constraints into part sorting out some way to coordinate the pattern of the gathering. Li et al [23] use a social occasion of pre-shown bits to design the wellsprings of data and enhance the piece game plan locally to further develop bunching execution.…”
Section: Review Of Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can handle well intra-pattern action variations, such as scale and speed variations; moreover, it is insensitive to dynamic and clutter backgrounds and even partial occlusions; it achieves an accuracy of 93.30% on the KTH dataset. Tong et al [17] presented a new nonnegative matrix factorization with local constraint and proposed a nonnegative matrix factorization with temporal dependencies constraint; the method can achieve an accuracy of 93.96% on the KTH dataset. Fu et al [18] proposed a method that uses multi-scale volumetric video representation and adaptively selects an optimal space–time scale under which the saliency of a patch is the most significant; the method can achieve an accuracy of 94.33% on the KTH dataset.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, deep learning has exhibited outstanding performance in feature representation tasks [18][19][20]. Therefore, many researchers have introduced deep learning into matrix factorization and proposed a large number of deep feature representation methods [21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. Ahn et al [21] proposed multilayer nonnegative matrix factorization (MNMF).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%