2010
DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2010.1118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrogen removal in submerged MBR with intermittent aeration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Moussa et al ., nitrite‐oxidizing bacteria are remarkably more resistant to salinity than ammonia‐oxidizing bacteria 31 . As the MBR system was operated with extreme aeration (without having an anoxic condition), the ammonium‐N in the MBR tank could be mostly converted to nitrate, which is a stabilized form for nitrogen transformation 32,33 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Moussa et al ., nitrite‐oxidizing bacteria are remarkably more resistant to salinity than ammonia‐oxidizing bacteria 31 . As the MBR system was operated with extreme aeration (without having an anoxic condition), the ammonium‐N in the MBR tank could be mostly converted to nitrate, which is a stabilized form for nitrogen transformation 32,33 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 As the MBR system was operated with extreme aeration (without having an anoxic condition), the ammonium-N in the MBR tank could be mostly converted to nitrate, which is a stabilized form for nitrogen transformation. 32,33 Figure 5 shows the distribution of the bacterial population at the class and order levels within the predominant phylum with relative abundances higher than 10%. Within Gammaproteobacteria, there were three predominant orders: KF-JG30-C25, Xanthomonadales, and Burkholderiales; Burkholderiales were the most dominant (Fig.…”
Section: Treatment Performance Under Different Salinity Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fouling reduction and 50 % energy saving were also reported by Fan and Zhou who employed a cyclic aeration of 10 s on and 10 s off. In addition, intermittent aeration can significantly increase nutrient removal in MBRs by enriching microorganisms that are responsible for nitrogen and phosphorus reduction . On the other hand, it was found that cyclic aeration induces sludge deflocculation and thereby changes the fouling rates .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%