2011
DOI: 10.1260/0263-6174.29.4.357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: This contribution compares experimental nitrogen adsorption isotherms with molecular simulation results on effective non-porous silica models. A Molecular Dynamic (MD) annealing temperature scheme was adopted for the formulation of three samples of the solid surface. By means of Grand Canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulations, nitrogen adsorption isotherms were obtained for each sample, with charged and uncharged nitrogen molecules, and compared with relevant experimental data. Following comparison of the exper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Characterization by nitrogen adsorption at 77 K was performed as described elsewhere . Methylcyclohexane (>99%, Aldrich) and n -pentane (99%, Lab-Scan) were the selected VOCs, outgassed in vacuum by repeated freeze–thaw cycles prior to the determination of the isotherms.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Characterization by nitrogen adsorption at 77 K was performed as described elsewhere . Methylcyclohexane (>99%, Aldrich) and n -pentane (99%, Lab-Scan) were the selected VOCs, outgassed in vacuum by repeated freeze–thaw cycles prior to the determination of the isotherms.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, we compared experimental nitrogen adsorption isotherms to molecular simulation results on effective nonporous silica models . A molecular dynamic (MD) annealing temperature scheme was used for the formulation of different samples of the amorphous silica (a similar methodology based on Monte Carlo annealing can also be implemented) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations