2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.abb.2011.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitric oxide reduces sickle hemoglobin polymerization: Potential role of nitric oxide-induced charge alteration in depolymerization

Abstract: We previously demonstrated that inhaling nitric oxide (NO) increases the oxygen affinity of sickle red blood cells (RBCs) in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). Our recent studies found that NO lowered the P50 values of sickle hemoglobin (HbS) hemolysates but did not increase methemoglobin (metHb) levels, supporting the role of NO, but not metHb, in the oxygen affinity of HbS. Here we examine the mechanism by which NO increases HbS oxygen affinity. Because anti-sickling agents increase sickle RBC oxygen a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, a rabbit erythrocyte model was used to demonstrate that HU regulates the production of NO by the enzyme endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) [114], and further showing that the released NO induces blood flow-induced ATP, which is a known mediator of vasodilation through endothelial cell purinergic receptor binding [115118] and subsequent release of endothelial NO [119–121]. The improved blood flow results from the NO-induced increase in oxygen affinity of sickle erythrocytes in SCD patients because NO exhibits anti-sickling properties and inhibits HbS polymerization [85,122]. NO may be released by endothelial cells and/or erythrocytes, establishing a feedback loop with flow-derived ATP release from erythrocytes and provide rationale for some of the immediate reported benefits of HU treatment (improved blood flow and attenuated sickling events in SCD patients) [123].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a rabbit erythrocyte model was used to demonstrate that HU regulates the production of NO by the enzyme endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) [114], and further showing that the released NO induces blood flow-induced ATP, which is a known mediator of vasodilation through endothelial cell purinergic receptor binding [115118] and subsequent release of endothelial NO [119–121]. The improved blood flow results from the NO-induced increase in oxygen affinity of sickle erythrocytes in SCD patients because NO exhibits anti-sickling properties and inhibits HbS polymerization [85,122]. NO may be released by endothelial cells and/or erythrocytes, establishing a feedback loop with flow-derived ATP release from erythrocytes and provide rationale for some of the immediate reported benefits of HU treatment (improved blood flow and attenuated sickling events in SCD patients) [123].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the incubation, a fixative solution is added and the number of sickled cells is manually counted under a light microscope. In several preclinical and early phase pharmacologic trials in SCD, this assay has been used as an outcome variable to predict clinical effect . Although such a sickling assay is useful, it has several disadvantages: there are questions about its sensitivity and variability and it lacks automated methods to quantitate the percentage of sickled cells from large samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The morphology of sickled RBCs has been studied extensively using light microscopy (Christoph et al, 2005;Coletta et al, 1988;Horiuchi et al, 1988;Pierre, 2002;van Beers et al, 2014;Zhang et al, 2014) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM; Horiuchi et al, 1988;Kaul and Xue, 1991;Pierre, 2002) to gather information on cell morphology. In fact, preclinical trials and treatment-testing experiments routinely use lightmicroscopy-derived percentages of sickled cells as predictors of outcome (Abdulmalik et al, 2005;Chang et al, 1983a,b;Ikuta et al, 2011;Zhang et al, 2014). However, both light microscopy and SEM provide only two-dimensional data and, in the case of light microscopy, at relatively low resolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%