1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0024-3205(97)00661-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitric oxide production by endothelial cells: Comparison of three methods of quantification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
47
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The identification of NO as the molecule responsible for the amperometric signal induced by histamine was assessed by inhibition of NO synthase by 1 mmol/L L-NMMA, as previously published. 23,24 In agreement with previous data obtained with the same electrode system, 22 NO oxidation at 37°C in PBS gave a dose-dependent, linear current response over the 5 to 50 nmol/L concentration range ( Figure 1). Similar electrochemical responses to NO were observed in the absence or presence of 60 g/mL 7-ketocholesterol, indicating the absence of a direct interaction between 7-ketocholesterol and NO (Figure 1).…”
Section: Measurement Of No Productionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The identification of NO as the molecule responsible for the amperometric signal induced by histamine was assessed by inhibition of NO synthase by 1 mmol/L L-NMMA, as previously published. 23,24 In agreement with previous data obtained with the same electrode system, 22 NO oxidation at 37°C in PBS gave a dose-dependent, linear current response over the 5 to 50 nmol/L concentration range ( Figure 1). Similar electrochemical responses to NO were observed in the absence or presence of 60 g/mL 7-ketocholesterol, indicating the absence of a direct interaction between 7-ketocholesterol and NO (Figure 1).…”
Section: Measurement Of No Productionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…22,23,[32][33][34][35] Experiments of NO release were conducted on histamine-stimulated HUVECs, an experimental system in which the release of NO has been well documented. 24,25,34,35 The real-time measurement of NO by electrochemical detection revealed for the first time that both 7-ketocholesterol and 7␤-hydroxycholesterol directly reduced the amounts of NO released by stimulated HUVECs. With the relatively short incubation periods used in the current study, no cytotoxicity was observed, indicating that the reduction of NO release cannot be explained by the cytotoxic, apoptotic properties of 7-ketocholesterol on endothelial cells that has been observed after much longer incubation periods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Griess reaction was the method of choice to evaluate serum nitrite/nitrate levels with the following modifications. In vivo NO concentration* estimation was done via analysis of nitrites in serum without reduction of nitrates (NO -3 ) step, as it has recently been suggested that inclusion of nitrates in the determination of in vivo NO* causes an overestimation of approximately 500% than when NO was measured by the haemoglobin reaction (Privat et al, 1997). Briefly, serum samples were deproteinized with 0.6 N perchloric acid and the supernatants were assayed for nitrite concentration through recording the absorbance at 540 nm.…”
Section: Laboratory Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first is based on the acidic Griess reagent assay [46][47][48][49] and the second on the conversion of oxyhaemoglobin to methaemoglobin by NO [50][51][52]. However, both methods have inherent difficulties.…”
Section: Analysis Of No Stock Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%