2010
DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.109.903468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: DO; for the RESILIENT InvestigatorsBackground-Controversy still exists regarding the best endovascular treatment strategy for patients with symptomatic disease of the superficial femoral artery. There are conflicting data regarding the benefits of superficial femoral artery stenting and the role of primary stenting compared with balloon angioplasty with provisional stent implantation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
286
0
8

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 581 publications
(300 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
6
286
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The reduced need for stenting has distinct advantages. Although stenting improves patency compared with PTA, 18-21 TLR rate has remained high on follow-up ranging from 19 to 37% 18,19,22,23 at 1 year and up to 49% at 2 years. 20 The main mechanism of reducing restenosis with stenting is the reduction of elastic recoil and negative remodeling with no impact on SMC proliferation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reduced need for stenting has distinct advantages. Although stenting improves patency compared with PTA, 18-21 TLR rate has remained high on follow-up ranging from 19 to 37% 18,19,22,23 at 1 year and up to 49% at 2 years. 20 The main mechanism of reducing restenosis with stenting is the reduction of elastic recoil and negative remodeling with no impact on SMC proliferation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Randomization of 476 patients accounted for an expected 15% loss of patients from the primary, as observed in recent studies of similar populations. 29,30 This sample size provides > 95% power for the primary safety endpoint based on a one-sided α = 0.025 Farrington-Manning test of binomial proportions with a 5% non-inferiority margin.…”
Section: Sample Size and Statistical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The impact of this potential bias was observed in several studies; for example, of subjects with restenosis documented by angiography in the THUNDER study, the decision to reintervene (TLR) was made by the unblinded physician in only 29% of DCB cases but 95% of control PTA cases 1 . Another potential source of unintentional bias was apparent in historic studies that counted bail-out stenting as an immediate primary endpoint failure 29,30 . In RESILIENT 29 and ZILVER PTX 30 the test group had a 40 and 50% primary endpoint advantage over control immediately following the index procedure.…”
Section: Accepted M Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations