2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NIRS and iSPA-PLS for predicting total anthocyanin content in jaboticaba fruit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Determined correlation coeffi cients of the calibration set outperform those coeffi cients of prediction models (R 2 c >R 2 p ), which is substantiated with the values of root mean square error of calibration (RMSEC) and validation (RMSEP), showing lower values in the calibration set, and exactly such trend is expected (10,24). The RPD value (29) was included in the evaluation of the PLS models where a good validation model should have a lower RMSEP and higher R 2 and RPD. Studies of Cervellati et al (17,18) have shown linear relationship between total phenols and antioxidant activity (measured with the DPPH method and BR reaction), and our study confi rms good correlations of the mentioned parameters with the NIR spectra that are also in a positive relation with the RAC and IT.…”
Section: Applied Chemometricsmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Determined correlation coeffi cients of the calibration set outperform those coeffi cients of prediction models (R 2 c >R 2 p ), which is substantiated with the values of root mean square error of calibration (RMSEC) and validation (RMSEP), showing lower values in the calibration set, and exactly such trend is expected (10,24). The RPD value (29) was included in the evaluation of the PLS models where a good validation model should have a lower RMSEP and higher R 2 and RPD. Studies of Cervellati et al (17,18) have shown linear relationship between total phenols and antioxidant activity (measured with the DPPH method and BR reaction), and our study confi rms good correlations of the mentioned parameters with the NIR spectra that are also in a positive relation with the RAC and IT.…”
Section: Applied Chemometricsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The model performance was evaluated with R 2 and the regression point displacement (RPD). RPD value is the ratio of the standard error of performance and the standard deviation (29). Models with the prediction classifi ed as excellent have RPD>3, while RPD<1.5 indicates that presented calibration model is not suitable for prediction, values between 1.5 and 2 show a possibility to distinguish high and low levels with the presented model, and values in the range of 2-2.5 and 2.5-3 show approximate quantitative prediction that is possible and prediction that is classifi ed as good, respectively.…”
Section: Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All values were calculated with respect to the i corr values measured with the Tafel method. In order to verify the ability of the PLS models to predict i corr values, root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) was calculated as follows: RMSEP=1Ip1normali=1Ipnormalynormalmnormalynormalps2 where y ps is the predicted value for the i th sample from the prediction set, y m is the measured value for the same sample, and I p is the number of observations in the prediction set.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, these pretreatments resulted in models with a higher RPD and smaller bias (mean difference between reference values and values estimated by the model). According to Mariani et al ., RPD values of between 1.5 and 2 indicate that the model is able to distinguish between high and low values, for values between 2.0 and 2.5 the model can roughly predict the data and for values between 2.5 and 3, an excellent prediction can be obtained. RPD values varied, respectively, between 1.813 and 2.061 and between 1.794 and 2.966 for the validation set samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%