Nilvadipine in mild to moderate Alzheimer disease: A randomised controlled trial

Abstract

BackgroundThis study reports the findings of the first large-scale Phase III investigator-driven clinical trial to slow the rate of cognitive decline in Alzheimer disease with a dihydropyridine (DHP) calcium channel blocker, nilvadipine. Nilvadipine, licensed to treat hypertension, reduces amyloid production, increases regional cerebral blood flow, and has demonstrated anti-inflammatory and anti-tau activity in preclinical studies, properties that could have disease-modifying effects for Alzheimer disease. We aimed to determine if nilvadipine was effective in slowing cognitive decline in subjects with mild to moderate Alzheimer disease.Methods and findingsNILVAD was an 18-month, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial that randomised participants between 15 May 2013 and 13 April 2015. The study was conducted at 23 academic centres in nine European countries. Of 577 participants screened, 511 were eligible and were randomised (258 to placebo, 253 to nilvadipine). Participants took a trial treatment capsule once a day after breakfast for 78 weeks. Participants were aged >50 years, meeting National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke/Alzheimer’s disease Criteria (NINCDS-ADRDA) for diagnosis of probable Alzheimer disease, with a Standardised Mini-Mental State Examination (SMMSE) score of ≥12 and <27. Participants were randomly assigned to 8 mg sustained-release nilvadipine or matched placebo. The a priori defined primary outcome was progression on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Cognitive Subscale-12 (ADAS-Cog 12) in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population (n = 498), with the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale sum of boxes (CDR-sb) as a gated co-primary outcome, eligible to be promoted to primary end point conditional on a significant effect on the ADAS-Cog 12. The analysis set had a mean age of 73 years and was 62% female. Baseline demographic and Alzheimer disease–specific characteristics were similar between treatment groups, with reported mean of 1.7 years since diagnosis and mean SMMSE of 20.4. The prespecified primary analyses failed to show any treatment benefit for nilvadipine on the co-primary outcome (p = 0.465). Decline from baseline in ADAS-Cog 12 on placebo was 0.79 (95% CI, −0.07–1.64) at 13 weeks, 6.41 (5.33–7.49) at 52 weeks, and 9.63 (8.33–10.93) at 78 weeks and on nilvadipine was 0.88 (0.02–1.74) at 13 weeks, 5.75 (4.66–6.85) at 52 weeks, and 9.41 (8.09–10.73) at 78 weeks. Exploratory analyses of the planned secondary outcomes showed no substantial effects, including on the CDR-sb or the Disability Assessment for Dementia. Nilvadipine appeared to be safe and well tolerated. Mortality was similar between groups (3 on nilvadipine, 4 on placebo); higher counts of adverse events (AEs) on nilvadipine (1,129 versus 1,030), and serious adverse events (SAEs; 146 versus 101), were observed. There were 14 withdrawals because of AEs. Major limitations of this study were that subjects had established dementia and the likelihood that non-Alzheimer subjects w...

Antihypertensive agents in Alzheimer’s disease: beyond vascular protection

“…The study failed to demonstrate any effect of nilvadipine on the cognitive outcome. However, in predefined subgroup analyses, there was less cognitive decline in patients with MMSE >20, in males and in APOE ε4 carriers [97]. As found in the aforementioned casereport, a subgroup of patients in the NILVAD trial showed an increase of cerebral blood flow in hippocampal regions [98].…”

Validation study of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale‐Cognitive Subscale for people with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease in Chinese communities

“…The ADAS-Cog can be used to distinguish AD from normal aging (for example, 12 points have been designated to denote AD, with a sensitivity and specificity ≥94% by Nogueira et al,10 points for AD, with the sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 91% by Jemma et al), 18,20 as well as to assess the severity of AD 22,23 and the efficacy of antidementia treatment. 24,25 In addition, ADAS-Cog can also be used to discriminate AD from depression 19 and vascular dementia. 26 However, the discriminative power of this scale in the MCI population is controversial.…”

Causal relationship of cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers with the risk of Alzheimer’s disease: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study

“…Although Aβ, p-tau, and t-tau in the CSF have been reported to be useful as disease progression markers 41, 44 , there is still little evidence for their causal relationship with LOAD in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) 45, 46 . Recent RCTs on the elimination of the accumulated Aβ or tau proteins could not provide solid evidence for improvement of the symptoms of LOAD 47–49 . While clinical trials with small sample sizes have shown that eliminating the Aβ elements led to symptomatic improvement 50 , larger studies have failed to establish consistent results 47, 51, 52 .…”