1982
DOI: 10.2307/1940109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Niche Breadth, Resource Availability, and Inference

Abstract: Measures of niche breadth are discussed in relation to the distance between the resource use distribution and the resource availability distribution. Methods are developed for comparing breadth measures, testing a breadth measure equal to a given value, and for estimating confidence intervals. A new breadth measure is presented which has good statistical properties and is related to some commonly used niche overlap measures.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
115
1
9

Year Published

1989
1989
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
115
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…where FT is Smith's measure of niche breadth, p j is the proportion of individuals found in resource state j (Σp j = 1.0), and a j is the proportion of resource j is of the total resources (Σa j = 1.0) (Smith 1982). The 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the equation: ,…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where FT is Smith's measure of niche breadth, p j is the proportion of individuals found in resource state j (Σp j = 1.0), and a j is the proportion of resource j is of the total resources (Σa j = 1.0) (Smith 1982). The 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the equation: ,…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and !" has been criticized because these metrics do not account for resource availability (Hurlbert 1978;Smith 1982). Thus, comparing these values among species that occupy different sites, or that are collected at different times, can be the result of spatial and temporal variation in the availability of different resources (Martinez del Rio et al 2009).…”
Section: Levins Macarthur Niches and Isotopic Ecologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zero indicates random feeding. Bootstrapping procedure (300 simulations) was conducted on individual bites [keeping resource abundance constant (Smith 1982)] to estimate the confidence limits of electivity values. Ivlev's electivity values were tested against random feeding by looking if the confidence interval included zero or not.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This measure can take values between zero (specialist feeder) and one (generalist feeder). Seasonal difference in niche breadth was tested using Z-test (Smith 1982).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%