2008
DOI: 10.1080/15213260802178542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

News Selection Patterns as a Function of Race: The Discerning Minority and the Indiscriminating Majority

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar research confirms that low -status groups discriminate against relevant out-groups more than do high-status group members (Appiah, Knobloch-Westerwick, & Alter, 2013;Bettencourt et al, 2001;Brewer, 1979). In support, a number of studies across a variety of contexts reveal that majority/non-stigmatized group members show no in-group bias whereas minority/stigmatized group members show an in-group favorability bias (e.g., Knobloch-Westerwick, Appiah, & Alter, 2008). These findings are not surprising given in-group preference and out-group discrimination are more likely to occur when people highly identify with their in-group and the in-group holds significant importance in defining their self-concept (Lewis & Sherman, 2010;Vanhoomissen & Van Overwalle, 2010).…”
Section: Social Identity Theory and In-group Preferencementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Similar research confirms that low -status groups discriminate against relevant out-groups more than do high-status group members (Appiah, Knobloch-Westerwick, & Alter, 2013;Bettencourt et al, 2001;Brewer, 1979). In support, a number of studies across a variety of contexts reveal that majority/non-stigmatized group members show no in-group bias whereas minority/stigmatized group members show an in-group favorability bias (e.g., Knobloch-Westerwick, Appiah, & Alter, 2008). These findings are not surprising given in-group preference and out-group discrimination are more likely to occur when people highly identify with their in-group and the in-group holds significant importance in defining their self-concept (Lewis & Sherman, 2010;Vanhoomissen & Van Overwalle, 2010).…”
Section: Social Identity Theory and In-group Preferencementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Much recent work has extended the definition (e.g., Knobloch-Westerwick, Appiah, & Alter, 2008;Knobloch-Westerwick & Romero, 2011;Zillmann & Bryant, 1985). Today, this term usually refers to the idea that individuals' choices of media messages and their exposure time allocations are typically not proportionate to message provision and instead reflect preferences for certain content and avoidance of others.…”
Section: Approaches To Measuring Time Spent With Informationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We have also examined the impact of health message features on selective exposure to health news messages (Hastall & Knobloch-Westerwick, in press; Knobloch-Westerwick & Sarge, in press). Other studies have focused on the origins of gender-specific news preferences (Knobloch-Westerwick & Alter, 2007;Knobloch-Westerwick, Brück, & Hastall, 2006), selective exposure to attitude-consistent and counter-attitudinal political information (Knobloch-Westerwick & Meng, 2009) and selective exposure as a function of race (Knobloch-Westerwick et al, 2008), life dissatisfaction (Knobloch-Westerwick, Hastall, & Rossmann, 2009), and social comparison considerations .…”
Section: Applications and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Some scholarship reflects the view that African-Americans evaluate the black press more positively than they do the daily general audience alternative 32. Additionally, studies using unobtrusive measures of online news selection show that blacks pay significantly more attention to the race of news story subjects than do whites and that they are more likely to seek out stories if the main character is black 33. This line of research suggests that black newspaper content would appeal to blacks because it resonates with black self-identity.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%