2017
DOI: 10.23736/s1824-4785.17.03019-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

News and views on in-vivo imaging of neurotransmission using PET and MRI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
(134 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That said, the directionality of the ΔCBF associations with both PET and mRNA templates accords with the expected functions of supraspinal receptors in pain processing. This is perhaps best illustrated here by the positive correlation of the receptors that exert inhibitory effects (e.g., μ‐opioid, D2/D3, ADR‐A‐2A/C and 5‐HT‐7) and the negative/weak correlation for receptors that are thought to facilitate pain signals or are more associated with behavioural and emotional aspects of the pain experience (e.g., D5, 5‐HTR‐1A/B, 5‐HTR‐2A and 5‐HTR‐3B; Sander & Hesse, 2017 ). More importantly, considerations regarding directionality relate to existing literature that has directly investigated receptor‐specific PET and haemodynamic measures at a mechanistic level, further adding credence to the ability of the techniques employed here to capture meaningful molecular relationships (Sander et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That said, the directionality of the ΔCBF associations with both PET and mRNA templates accords with the expected functions of supraspinal receptors in pain processing. This is perhaps best illustrated here by the positive correlation of the receptors that exert inhibitory effects (e.g., μ‐opioid, D2/D3, ADR‐A‐2A/C and 5‐HT‐7) and the negative/weak correlation for receptors that are thought to facilitate pain signals or are more associated with behavioural and emotional aspects of the pain experience (e.g., D5, 5‐HTR‐1A/B, 5‐HTR‐2A and 5‐HTR‐3B; Sander & Hesse, 2017 ). More importantly, considerations regarding directionality relate to existing literature that has directly investigated receptor‐specific PET and haemodynamic measures at a mechanistic level, further adding credence to the ability of the techniques employed here to capture meaningful molecular relationships (Sander et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the utility of these techniques for understanding the neural correlates of both acute and chronic pain conditions, they are inherently unable to delineate the neurochemical substrates underlying the fMRI signal (Sander & Hesse, 2017 ; Schmidt‐Wilcke, 2015 ). Analgesic drugs mediate their effects through modulating neurotransmitter systems at the molecular level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…receptor density) and dynamically (neurotransmitter release; for review, e.g. see [ 149 ]). Molecular PET can quantify the targets (receptors and transporters) of specific neurotransmitters by imaging radioligands in vivo .…”
Section: Scales Of Neural Interrogation and Decodingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of fMRI with PET (e.g. [ 149 , 213 ]; figure 2 ), which has been developed over the past 15 years [ 214 ] enhances and informs insights gained with single-modality methods. While both imaging modalities provide functional measures of neural activity, they offer distinct advantages.…”
Section: Multi-scale Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most other methods require bulky and costly units for accurate measurements. For example, positron emission tomography (PET) [24][25][26][27][28][29][30] and single-photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) [31][32][33][34][35] allow for highly sensitive measurement of neurotransmitters in a medium, but they also require large and expensive scanners. Hence, the field of neurotransmitter sensing would benefit from a compact and simple method of neurotransmitter sensing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%