Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
125
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
13
125
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…These differences persist in pre-school and school-age children 76 . Notably, early ERP measures are predictive of reading skills at school 77,78 . Another study showed that ERPs obtained hours after birth have a strong relation to reading skills many years later, predicting whether the infant will develop dyslexia at age 8 with 81% accuracy 79 .…”
Section: R E V I E Wmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These differences persist in pre-school and school-age children 76 . Notably, early ERP measures are predictive of reading skills at school 77,78 . Another study showed that ERPs obtained hours after birth have a strong relation to reading skills many years later, predicting whether the infant will develop dyslexia at age 8 with 81% accuracy 79 .…”
Section: R E V I E Wmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, in the Jyväskylä Longitudinal Study of Dyslexia (JLD) as well as in other longitudinal studies, infant brain measures have been shown to predict preschool language and elementary school reading problems (Guttorm, Leppänen, Poikkeus, Eklund, Lyytinen, & Lyytinen, 2005;Leppänen et al, 2010;Molfese, 2000;van der Leij et al, 2013). In the current study, within the at-risk group, brain responses at the age of six months were strongly related to reading speed at 14 years in 8 th grade, and also to preschool cognitive skills phonology, letter knowledge, rapid automatized naming (RAN), and verbal short-term memory (verbal STM).…”
Section: Predicting Reading Until Adolescencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are studies linking rapid processing [64 -66] or beat detection [67] in pre-schoolers to future phonological awareness, as well as studies failing to find associations or producing unexpected findings [68]. There are also studies of infant and young children's brain responses to auditory stimuli that are predictive of future language and literacy development but do not fit within temporal theories because their stimuli were neither rapid nor beat-related [63,69,70].…”
Section: Presumed Links In a Causal Chain: What Do The Data Show?mentioning
confidence: 99%