“…Both Saad-Filho and Lavinas agree that government transfers, indirect taxation, subsidies and expanded household debt fostered a transition towards a mass-consumption society and got in the way of new social policies serving as a step to greater equality in society. This paradigm remains in place nonetheless, even though, as Rival et al (2015) note in this issue, its limitations have consistently been identified by the influential regional think tank, the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), which has forcefully encouraged governments to go beyond the cash transfer model in order to tackle the deep-seated causes of inequalities (Calvo, 2016; also Grugel and Riggirozzi, 2018). Still, whatever judgements we make of the model, the era has witnessed improvements in terms of expansion of programmes, recognition of new subjects of welfare, the introduction of rights-based policies, greater access to education and health and higher levels of employment than in the past.…”