2020
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.191462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New theropod remains and implications for megaraptorid diversity in the Winton Formation (lower Upper Cretaceous), Queensland, Australia

Abstract: The holotype specimen of the megaraptorid Australovenator wintonensis , from the Upper Cretaceous Winton Formation (Rolling Downs Group, Eromanga Basin) of central Queensland, is the most complete non-avian theropod found in Australia to date. In fact, the holotype of A. wintonensis and isolated megaraptorid teeth (possibly referable to Australovenator ) constitute the only theropod body fossils reported from the Winton Formation. Herein, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pairwise comparison workflow presented here offers the possibility to quantitatively evaluate the morphology of fragmentary fossils that might otherwise be ignored, and support qualitative anatomical observations used for taxonomic assignments. Uniquely, this approach does not require large sample sizes, can be applied to a select few exemplars, and is particularly advantageous when considering fragmentary fossil records, such as those of Australian Cretaceous dinosaurs ( White et al, 2020 ). It should be emphasised, however, that an isolated pairwise comparison (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The pairwise comparison workflow presented here offers the possibility to quantitatively evaluate the morphology of fragmentary fossils that might otherwise be ignored, and support qualitative anatomical observations used for taxonomic assignments. Uniquely, this approach does not require large sample sizes, can be applied to a select few exemplars, and is particularly advantageous when considering fragmentary fossil records, such as those of Australian Cretaceous dinosaurs ( White et al, 2020 ). It should be emphasised, however, that an isolated pairwise comparison (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NMV P186153 was originally assigned to the theropod clade Neovenatoridae ( Benson et al, 2012 ) but was more recently referred to Megaraptoridae ( Poropat et al, 2019 ). Based on an abundance of shed teeth, megaraptorids are considered to be the dominant Australian Cretaceous theropod, despite being known only from three partial skeletons ( Hocknull et al, 2009 ; White et al, 2012 , 2013 , 2015 , 2016 , 2020 ; Bell et al, 2016 ; Poropat et al, 2019 ). To date, other Australian Cretaceous theropods do not preserve their manual unguals ( Benson et al, 2012 ; Brougham, Smith & Bell, 2019 , 2020 ) and, since NMV P186153 was recently assigned to Megaraptoridae based on comprehensive comparisons with the megaraptorid Australovenator ( Poropat et al, 2019 ), we adopt our new workflow to explore the morphology of NMV P186153 within the context of the manual phalanges I-2 and II-3 in Australovenator wintonensis ( Fig.…”
Section: Methods and Workflowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The only theropods heretofore reported from the Winton Formation are megaraptorids, notably Australovenator wintonensis (Hocknull et al, 2009;White et al, 2012;White et al, 2013;White et al, 2015a;White et al, 2015b;White et al, 2016;White et al, 2020). The type specimen of Australovenator preserves elements pertaining to both pedes, such that a composite pes can be assembled from left and right elements (Hocknull et al, 2009;Poropat et al, 2019b: Table S2; White et al, 2013;White et al, 2016).…”
Section: Description Of Track Morphotypesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Note: Superscript numbers refer to citations: 1 ( Cook, 2005 ), 2 ( Hocknull, 1997 ), 3 ( Hocknull, 2000 ), 4 Hocknull personal observation (2002, 2009, 2019), 5 ( Ludbrook, 1985 ), 6 ( Fletcher & Salisbury, 2014 ), 7 ( Jell, 2004 ), 8 ( Elliott & Cook, 2004 ), 9 ( Salisbury, 2003 ), 10 ( Kemp, 1991 ), 11 ( Kemp, 1997 ), 12 ( Berrell et al, 2014 ), 13 ( Faggotter, Salisbury & Yabumoto, 2007 ), 14 ( Mond, 1974 ), 15 ( Salisbury, 2005 ), 16 ( Scanlon & Hocknull, 2008 ), 17 ( Salisbury et al, 2006 ), 18 ( Pentland et al, 2019 ), 19 ( Hocknull et al, 2009 ), 20 ( Poropat et al, 2016 ), 21 ( Hocknull et al, 2019 ), 22 ( Poropat et al, 2019 ), 23 ( Elliott, 2004 ), 24 ( White et al, 2020 ), 25 ( Thulborn & Wade, 1984 ), 26 ( Hocknull & Cook, 2008 ), 27 ( Salisbury et al, 2019 ), 28 ( Leahey & Salisbury, 2013 ), 29 ( Musser et al, 2009 ). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%