2006
DOI: 10.1177/0170840606067513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Organizational Forms, Human Resource Management and Structural Convergence? A Study of Japanese Organizations

Abstract: The prolonged, 10-year, economic downturn in Japan has had far-reaching implications for structure and human resource management (HRM) practices in Japanese organizations. In particular, the demise of hierarchical and group structures has been predicted, together with the end of distinctive HRM features such as lifetime employment and seniority-based pay. Using interview-based empirical data with a variety of Japanese organizations, this paper argues that such organizations are indeed moving towards flatter, l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(71 reference statements)
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research has shown that organizational change, such as downsizing, implementation of new equipment or plant and restructuring, can and often does lead to stress and increases in injury/illness (Savery & Luks, 2001;Morris et al, 2006). In a study conducted by Sharpley and co-workers (1997) on university staff, the most commonly reported sources of job stress were (in order of frequency): "lack of regular feedback about how well I am doing my job"; "lack of promotion opportunities"; "uncertainty about how amalgamations will influence me"; "overwork"; "being expected to do too much in too little time"; "lack of necessary equipment and/or infrastructure support".…”
Section: Stress In the Higher Education System And Its Effects On Orgmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Research has shown that organizational change, such as downsizing, implementation of new equipment or plant and restructuring, can and often does lead to stress and increases in injury/illness (Savery & Luks, 2001;Morris et al, 2006). In a study conducted by Sharpley and co-workers (1997) on university staff, the most commonly reported sources of job stress were (in order of frequency): "lack of regular feedback about how well I am doing my job"; "lack of promotion opportunities"; "uncertainty about how amalgamations will influence me"; "overwork"; "being expected to do too much in too little time"; "lack of necessary equipment and/or infrastructure support".…”
Section: Stress In the Higher Education System And Its Effects On Orgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Role ambiguity refers to the uncertainty, on the part of employees, about key requirements of their jobs, and about how they are expected to behave in those jobs (Nhundu, 1999;Conley & Woosley, 2000;Koustelios et al, 2004). Role conflict occurs when different groups or persons with whom an individual must interact hold conflicting expectations about that individual's behaviour and can result from inconsistent information (Koustelios et al, 2004;Johnson et al, 2005;Nwadiani, 2006;Chang & Lu, 2007).Research has shown that organizational change, such as downsizing, implementation of new equipment or plant and restructuring, can and often does lead to stress and increases in injury/illness (Savery & Luks, 2001;Morris et al, 2006). In a study conducted by Sharpley and co-workers (1997) on university staff, the most commonly reported sources of job stress were (in order of frequency): "lack of regular feedback about how well I am doing my job"; "lack of promotion opportunities"; "uncertainty about how amalgamations will influence me"; "overwork"; "being expected to do too much in too little time"; "lack of necessary equipment and/or infrastructure support".…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…collectivism in Japan and South Korea). A second example is the significant change in South Korea (Choi, 2004) and in Japan (Jung and Cheon, 2006;Morris et al, 2006;Pudelko and Mendenhall, 2007) away from seniority-based pay toward pay for (individual) performance, which may seem inconsistent with collectivistic and/or high uncertainty avoidance national cultures. As a third example, consider the use of so-called high performance work systems in the United States.…”
Section: Trompenaars and Hampdenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies point out that external pressure and competition force organizations to abandon mechanistic organizational forms and to design more flexible structures (GullØv, 2006;Morris et al, 2006;Schilling and Steensma, 2001), but a central and important question is whether these organic, flexible forms are appropriate for the development of hybrid competitive strategies. Thus, a need is apparent for research on the attributes of organizational structures that relate to hybrid competitive strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%