2015
DOI: 10.1002/2015gc006070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New methods for unmixing sediment grain size data

Abstract: Grain size distribution (GSD) data are widely used in Earth sciences and although large data sets are regularly generated, detailed numerical analyses are not routine. Unmixing GSDs into components can help understand sediment provenance and depositional regimes/processes. End‐member analysis (EMA), which fits one set of end‐members to a given data set, is a powerful way to unmix GSDs into geologically meaningful parts. EMA estimates end‐members based on covariability within a data set and can be considered as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
165
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 262 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
165
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Grain-size data were converted to three end members (EM) using the MatLab-based software Analy-Size (Paterson & Heslop 2015). The measurement was performed using a Laser Diffraction Particle Size Analyzer LS 13 320 (Beckman Coulter, USA) equipped with an Auto Prep Station.…”
Section: Grain-size and Biogeochemical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grain-size data were converted to three end members (EM) using the MatLab-based software Analy-Size (Paterson & Heslop 2015). The measurement was performed using a Laser Diffraction Particle Size Analyzer LS 13 320 (Beckman Coulter, USA) equipped with an Auto Prep Station.…”
Section: Grain-size and Biogeochemical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we reanalyzed the Sikouzi grain-size data composed of 3398 samples [15] using a new developed GUI software of AnalySize for processing and unmixing grain size data [19]. In the correlation map between multiple correlation coefficient (R 2 ) and end-member number (Fig 2A), end-member modeling improved greatly from 2 to 3 end members, but improved fairly less from 3 to 4 end members.…”
Section: End-member Modeling Of the Grain-size Recordmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The different end-members and their variations are corresponding to: (1) different controlling mechanisms of sediment transport and/or supplied from different sources and/or (2) optional mechanisms which change systematically the grain-size distribution along the transport and deposition of the sediment from the source area (Boulay et al, 2007;Prins et al, 2000;Prins & Weltje, 1999). In this study, we applied recently developed algorithms for end-member modeling of compositional data (Paterson & Heslop, 2015) to the grain-size distributions of the detrital sediment in core MD06-3050. Those studies applied the EMA method to identify the turbiditic, fluvial, eolian, or ice-rafted end-members based on their site character.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 10.1002/2017GC007247 specimen unmixing techniques, represent an improvement over existing algorithms for addressing major issues in identifying grain-size subpopulations (Paterson & Heslop, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%